🥃 Dr Tullio Simoncini Kontakt

TULLIO SIMONCINI, ĎAĽŠÍ NEBEZPEČNÝ ŠARLATÁN PROPAGOVANÝ MERCOLOM Stanovisko Americkej onkologickej spoločnosti:
Tradycyjna medycyna nie zna dokładnych przyczyn powstawania nowotworów [1], a oferowane przez nią leczenie polega na wstrzykiwaniu do krwiobiegu chemicznych, niezwykle toksycznych, substancji uszkadzających wszystkie tkanki i narządy w ciele. Publikacje naukowe potwierdzają, że chemioterapię przeżywa zaledwie 2% pacjentów [2], a wielu z nich umiera w pierwszym miesiącu leczenia [3] (zachęcam do przeczytania artykułu o szkodliwości chemioterapii). Pomiędzy 1999 a 2017 rokiem liczba zgonów z powodu nowotworów wzrosła aż o 66% (5,75 mln vs 9,56 mln). [4] Statystyki niezbicie wskazują na to, że konwencjonalna medycyna zawodzi w kwestii leczenia nowotworów. Nic więc dziwnego, że coraz większa liczba naukowców i lekarzy odwraca się od tradycyjnych terapii na rzecz naturalnych metod leczenia raka, które są nie tylko bezpieczne dla organizmu, ale także przynoszą o wiele lepsze rezultaty. Przełomowe badania naukowców z Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej dr Ratha w KaliforniiJakie są mechanizmy rozwoju raka?Badania potwierdzające skuteczność naturalnych składników w leczeniu rakaJakie naturalne substancje wykorzystali naukowcy w walce z rakiem?Kontrowersyjne odkrycie dr Tullio SimonciniJak powiązane są badania dr Ratha i teoria dr Simoncini?Równowaga kwasowo-zasadowa kluczowa w zapobieganiu raka?Medycyna tradycyjna i badania naukowe potwierdzają, że warzywa i owoce zapobiegają rakowiWybrane publikacje dr Ratha i dr Niedzwiecki w PubMed:Źródła: Przełomowe badania naukowców z Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej dr Ratha w Kalifornii Badania kliniczne naukowców z Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej dr Ratha w Kalifornii są prawdopodobnie najbardziej rzetelnym źródłem potwierdzającym skuteczność naturalnych metod leczenia nowotworów. Dr med. Matthias Rath oraz doktor biochemii Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, nie tylko napisali książkę pt. Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, w której w prosty sposób tłumaczą rolę składników odżywczych w leczeniu nowotworów, ale opublikowali ponad 70 prac naukowych potwierdzających, że kompleks naturalnych mikroskładników wykazuje skuteczność w kontrolowaniu mechanizmów ponad 40 różnych rodzajów komórek nowotworowych. Jak mówi dr Niedzwiecki „publikacje te są dostępne w PubMed – głównym źródle informacji medycznej i naukowej. Wiedza ta jest akceptowana w kręgach naukowych, jako że jesteśmy zapraszani przez redaktorów różnych książek naukowych, by publikować nasze osiągnięcia jako rozdziały w ich książkach.” [5] Kim są dr Rath oraz dr Niedzwiecki? Aleksandra Niedzwiecki jest doktorem biochemii, członkiem American College of Nutrition oraz współredaktorką magazynu „Cellular Health Communications”. W przeszłości miała okazję współpracować z dwoma noblistami – prof. Geraldem Edelmanem oraz dr Linusem Paulingiem. Pod jej nazwiskiem opublikowanych zostało ponad 90 prac naukowych. Obecnie jest przewodniczącą zarządu i dyrektorem badań Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej Dr. Ratha w Kalifornii. [5] Matthias Rath jest lekarzem medycyny, naukowcem, a także członkiem American Heart Association oraz New York Academy of Sciences. Po ukończeniu szkoły medycznej rozpoczął pracę w Klinice Uniwersyteckiej w Hamburgu, gdzie skupiał się na badaniu przyczyn chorób układu sercowo-naczyniowego. W 1987 roku jego artykuł opisujący zależności pomiędzy niedoborem witaminy C a zdrowiem układu krążenia został opublikowany w czasopiśmie American Heart Association. Niedługo później Linus Pauling (dwukrotny laureat Nagrody Nobla) zaproponował mu stanowisko kierownika badań chorób sercowo-naczyniowych w swoim instytucie. [6] Obecnie dr Rath stoi na czele założonego przez siebie Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej Dr. Ratha w Kalifornii. Jakie są mechanizmy rozwoju raka? Aby zrozumieć w jaki sposób naukowcy wykorzystują naturalne składniki w powstrzymywaniu ekspansji raka, konieczne jest zrozumienie przyczyn rozwoju oraz mechanizmów rozprzestrzeniania się komórek nowotworowych. Przyczyny rozwoju raka Jak czytamy w książce autorstwa dr Ratha oraz dr Niedzwiecki, „raka powoduje wiele czynników, ale dla wszystkich typów nowotworów istnieje jeden wspólny mechanizm: trawienie tkanki łącznej otaczającej komórkę rakową”. Aby komórki rakowe mogły się rozprzestrzeniać, muszą przebić się przez otaczającą je tkankę łączną. W tym procesie wykorzystują produkowane przez siebie enzymy, które (jak określają to autorzy książki) pełnią funkcję „biologicznych nożyc”. Jak udowodnili naukowcy, wszystkie komórki nowotworowe (bez względu na to, w którym narządzie się rozwijają) wytwarzają te same enzymy trawiące tkankę łączną (głównie kolagen). Im więcej enzymów wytworzy dana komórka rakowa, tym szybciej się rozmnaża i rozprzestrzenia, skracając tym samym życie pacjenta. Dr Rath oraz dr Niedzwiecki udowodnili, że istnieją pewne naturalne substancje, które są w stanie zablokować niekontrolowane trawienie tkanki łącznej i, tym samym, ograniczyć rozprzestrzenianie komórek nowotworowych, a także doprowadzić do ich obumierania i remisji guza. [7] Substancjami tymi są: witamina C, L-lizyna, L-prolina, N-acetylocysteina (NAC), ekstrakt z zielonej herbaty (EGCG), selen, miedź, mangan, l-argninina i kwercetyna (więcej na temat roli poszczegółnych składników można przeczytać poniżej). Jak dochodzi do przerzutów? Masowa produkcja enzymów trawiących kolagen odgrywa także kluczową rolę w procesie tworzenia przerzutów. Jak czytamy w książce Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, „każdy guz spowity jest siecią niewielkich naczyń krwionośnych (włosowatych). Za pomocą enzymów trawiących kolagen pojedyncza komórka rakowa jest w stanie ‘przebić’ ściankę naczynia włosowatego i przedostać się do krwiobiegu. Po dostaniu się do wnętrza naczynia włosowatego, komórki rakowe wędrują dalej niesione strumieniem krwi (…) docierając do innych organów”. Następnie komórki rakowe (znów wykorzystując enzymy trawiące kolagen) opuszczają krwiobieg i zagłębiają w tkance nowego narządu, tworząc tym samym przerzut. [8] Jak odżywiają się komórki nowotworowe? Charakterystyczną cechą wszystkich nowotworów jest angiogeneza (czyli proces tworzenia naczyń włosowatych). Gdy guz rośnie powyżej ok. 1-1,5 mm, komórki rakowe zaczynają stymulować powstawanie nowych naczyń krwionośnych – dzięki nim dostarczany jest tlen oraz składniki odżywcze, które są niezbędne do dalszego wzrostu. [9] Badania potwierdzające skuteczność naturalnych składników w leczeniu raka Biorąc pod uwagę powyższe informacje, kluczowymi mechanizmami w walce rakiem są: blokowanie procesu trawienia tkanki łącznej (co zamyka komórkom rakowym drogę ekspansji);stymulacja produkcji kolagenu i innych składników tkanki łącznej (co zapewnia tkance łącznej stabilność);zablokowanie produkcji nowych naczyń krwionośnych (bez których komórki nowotworowe nie mogą się odżywiać);doprowadzenie do śmierci komórek rakowych (co powoduje zanik guza). Wszystkie powyższe cele zostały osiągnięte przy pomocy zestawu naturalnych mikroskładników, co potwierdzają liczne badania przeprowadzone w Instytucie Medycyny Komórkowej dr Ratha. Książka Zwycięstwo nad rakiem opisuje wiele badań klinicznych – każde z nich wskazuje na skuteczność naturalnych mikroskładników w walce z różnymi rodzajami komórek nowotworowych. Jeszcze więcej publikacji (gdzie badania opisane są w bardziej szczegółowy sposób) można znaleźć w PubMed (anglojęzycznej bazie danych zawierającej naukowe publikacje z dziedziny medycyny i nauk biologicznych). Z racji tego, że naukowcy przeprowadzali różnorodne eksperymenty (zarówno na poziomie komórkowym, jak i na żywych organizmach), badając aż 40 różnych rodzajów raka, nie ma możliwości, aby opisać je wszystkie tutaj. Publikacje z PubMed podlinkuję na końcu artykuły, a teraz skupię się na opisie wybranych badań opisanych w książce Zwycięstwo nad rakiem. Blokowanie enzymów trawiących tkankę łączną Blokowanie enzymu urokinazy Naukowcy opracowali sześć zestawów testowych – w każdym z nich umieścili taką samą ilość komórek raka prostaty. Pięć z nich zawierało mikroskładniki w różnych stężeniach, a jeden nie zwierał ich wcale. Następnego dnia badacze sprawdzili zawartość urokinazy (uPA) – enzymu trawiącego kolagen. Okazało się, że jej poziom jest proporcjonalny do stężenia mikroskładników – im wyższa dawka mikroskładników tym mniejszy poziom enzymu trawiącego kolagen. Te same rezultaty naukowcy osiągnęli, badając wiele innych rodzajów raka. Jak czytamy w książce, „w międzyczasie wyniki tych badań zostały potwierdzone przez innych naukowców. Wykazali oni, że przerzuty nowotworu (metastaza) zostały powstrzymane u myszy z upośledzoną produkcją enzymu urokinazy, podkreślając tym samym znaczenie tego enzymu w rozwoju raka”. [10] Blokowanie enzymu MMP Innym enzymem odgrywającym kluczową rolę w trawieniu tkanki łącznej przez komórki rakowe jest MMPS (metaloproteinazy matrycowe), w szczególności MMP-2 i MMP-9. Naukowcy przeprowadzili eksperyment podobny do poprzedniego, tym razem wykorzystując komórki raka pęcherza (pięć zestawów testujących, cztery z nich zawierały różne stężenia mikroskładników, a jeden z nich nie zawierał ich wcale). Podobnie jak w przypadku urokinazy, mikroskładniki okazały się skuteczne w hamowaniu MMP-2 i MMP-9. Najwyższe dawki tych substancji całkowicie zablokowały wydzielanie enzymów trawiących kolagen. Jak czytamy w książce, „w międzyczasie udało nam się potwierdzić ten efekt oddziaływania mikroelementów w 40 rodzajach ludzkich komórek nowotworowych”. [11] Powstrzymanie ekspansji komórek rakowych Kolejnym etapem badań było zweryfikowanie tego, czy mikroelementy są w stanie powstrzymać przenikanie komórek nowotworowych przez tkankę łączną. W tym celu naukowcy przygotowali 2 fiolki wypełnione płynem przypominającym ustrojowy. Górna i dolna część zbiorniczków została oddzielona przy pomocy specjalnej membrany zbudowanej z tkanki łącznej (Matrigel). W górnej części obu fiolek umieszczono taką samą ilość komórek rakowych; do jednej z nich wprowadzono także zestaw mikroelementów. Okazało się, że komórki w fiolce zawierającej zestaw mikroskładników nie przedostały się na drugą stronę membrany (w przeciwieństwie do komórek w drugim zbiorniczku). „Bazując na wcześniejszych doświadczeniach, wiedzieliśmy, że komórki rakowe łatwo przedostają się przez oddzielającą ją membranę tkanki łącznej i można je później odnaleźć – i policzyć – po drugiej stronie (…). Zasadniczo z im bardziej agresywnym typem raka mamy do czynienia, tym więcej komórek raka jest w stanie przedostać się na drugą stronę membrany. W rozległej serii eksperymentów wykazaliśmy, że specyficzny zestaw mikroelementów był w stanie całkowicie zablokować przebicie membrany tkanki łącznej przez wszystkie testowane przez nas rodzaje komórek raka.” [12] Naukowcy przebadali w ten sam sposób 40 różnych typów komórek nowotworowych. We wszystkich przypadkach udało się całkowicie zahamować inwazję raka, jednak osiągano ten cel przy różnych stężeniach mikroelementów. Dla przykładu, niskie dawki naturalnych składników pozwalały na całkowitą inhibicję raka piersi oraz chłoniaka Hodgkina. Umiarkowane dawki powstrzymywały ekspansję raka płuc, okrężnicy, szyjki macicy, skóry, kości, jąder, trzustki oraz chłoniaka nieziarniczego. Natomiast zahamowanie raka wątroby, pęcherza moczowego, nerek, jajników, prostaty, mózgu oraz białaczki wymagało użycia wysokiego stężenia mikroelementów. [13] Hamowanie przerzutów w organizmach żywych W 90% przypadków zgon pacjenta nie następuje z powodu guza pierwotnego (czyli tego, który wystąpił jako pierwszy), ale na skutek przerzutów. Zapobieganie metastazie jest zatem jednym z najważniejszych elementów walki z rakiem. Jak pokazały badania kliniczne na myszach, zestaw naturalnych mikroskładników wykazuje wysoki potencjał hamowania przerzutów. Naukowcy wstrzyknęli do krwiobiegu gryzoni taką samą ilość komórek czerniaka (raka skóry). Następnie podzielono je na 3 grupy: grupa kontrolna, której nie podawano mikroelementów;grupa otrzymująca mikroelementy w formie doustnej;grupa otrzymująca mikroelementy dożylnie. Okazało się, że wśród myszy, które przyjmowały doustną suplementację liczba przerzutów do płuc była o 60% niższa niż w przypadku grupy kontrolnej. Rezultaty były jeszcze lepsze w grupie gryzoni otrzymujących mikroelementy w formie dożylnej – w ich przypadku metastaza została zahamowana w ponad 80%. [14] Zapobieganie tworzeniu nowych naczyń krwionośnych Badania naukowców z Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej dr Ratha potwierdziły także, że zestaw naturalnych mikroskładników zapobiega tworzeniu nowych naczyń krwionośnych (niezbędnych do tego, aby komórki nowotworowe otrzymywały tlen i składniki odżywcze). Po przekrojeniu guza myszy nieotrzymujących suplementów widać było gęstą sieć nowo wytworzonych naczyń krwionośnych. Z kolei w nowotworze myszy, które przyjmowały mikroskładniki, widać było znikomą ilość lub całkowity brak nowych naczyń włosowatych. [15] Doprowadzenie do śmierci komórek i zaniku guza Naukowcy poddali komórki czerniaka działaniu różnych stężeń mikroelementów. Następnie pod mikroskopem obliczyli ilość: komórek żywych;komórek na wczesnym etapie apoptozy (czyli śmierci komórek);komórek w późnym stadium apoptozy (gdy większość komórek nowotworowych jest już martwa). „Wyniki pokazują, że im wyższe stężenie mikroelementów, tym więcej komórek rakowych uległo procesowi naturalnej śmierci. Przy najwyższym stężeniu mikroelementów, wszystkie komórki rakowe były w stadium zaawansowanej apoptozy (tzn. ginęły). Tak więc mikroelementy nie tylko okazują się być bezpiecznym sposobem zatrzymania dalszego rozwoju raka, lecz również mają zdolność, by powodować zanik już istniejących guzów” – piszą autorzy. [16] Jakie naturalne substancje wykorzystali naukowcy w walce z rakiem? Naturalne składniki, które hamują proces trawienia tkanki łącznej Wśród naturalnych substancji blokujących wydzielanie enzymów trawiących kolagen najważniejsza jest L-lizyna – aminokwas białkowy, który nie jest wytwarzany w naszym organizmie i musi być przyjmowany wraz z pożywieniem. Jak czytamy w książce „jeśli poprzez suplementację naszej diety zapewnimy organizmowi odpowiednią ilość lizyny, będzie ona mogła blokować specyficzne miejsca zakotwiczenia, w których enzymy rozpuszczające kolagen przyłączają się do cząsteczek tkanki łącznej. W ten sposób lizyna może uniemożliwić tym enzymom niekontrolowane trawienie tkanki łącznej”. [17] Innymi substancjami wspomagającymi blokowanie trawienia kolagenu są: witamina C, L-prolina, N-acetylocysteina (NAC), ekstrakt z zielonej herbaty (EGCG) oraz selen. [18] Naturalne składniki, które stymulują produkcję kolagenu i stabilizują tkankę łączną Innym ważnym aspektem leczenia i zapobiegania raka jest stabilizacja tkanki łącznej. W tym procesie kluczowa jest witamina C, która stymuluje produkcję kolagenu i elastyny, a dodatkowo jest niezbędna do stabilizacji nowo powstałych włókien kolagenowych. [19] Udział w wytwarzaniu i stabilizacji tkanki łącznej mają także miedź, mangan, L-lizyna oraz L-prolina. [18] Dwa ostatnie są ważnymi składnikami budulcowymi kolagenu (stanowią łącznie około 25% tego białka). Zarówno witamina C, jak i lizyna muszą być przyjmowane wraz z pożywieniem, ponieważ nasz organizm ich nie produkuje. Niestety dieta współczesnego człowieka zazwyczaj nie spełnia zapotrzebowania na te składniki. Większość z nas cierpi zatem na ich przewlekłe niedobory. Prolina z kolei jest produkowana przez ludzki organizm, jednak w ograniczonych ilościach, przez co również mogą występować u nas deficyty tej substancji. [19] Składniki hamujące formowanie nowych naczyń krwionośnych Substancjami spełniającymi kluczową rolę w procesie zahamowania angiogenezy (czyli tworzenia nowych naczyń włosowatych) są ekstrakt z zielonej herbaty (EGCG) oraz N-acetylocysteina (NAC). [18] Składniki powodujące śmierć komórek rakowych Zespół dr Ratha potwierdził, że komórki rakowe umierają pod wpływem działania witaminy C, ekstraktu z zielonej herbaty (EGCG), N-acetylocysteiny (NAC), selenu, l-argininy i l-proliny. W skład zestawu mikroskładników wchodziła także kwercetyna, która zapewnia synergię pomiędzy poszczególnymi składnikami. [18] Kontrowersyjne odkrycie dr Tullio Simoncini Kontrowersyjna teoria dr Tullio Simoncini zakładająca, że rak to tak naprawdę bardzo zaawansowana infekcja grzybicza była pierwszą informacją, na którą natknęłam się, szukając informacji o naturalnych metodach leczenia raka. Brzmiało niedorzecznie, więc z automatu zdyskredytowałam to założenie, uznając je za kompletnie absurdalne. Gdy jednak w końcu zdecydowałam się zagłębić w ten temat, okazało się, że teoria dr Simoncini jest zaskakująco logiczna. I wbrew pozorom, nie stoi wcale w opozycji do wspomnianych wyżej badań dr Ratha i dr Niedzwiecki. Ale o tym trochę później. Kim jest dr Simoncini? Tullio Simoncini specjalizował się w onkologii dziecięcej. Przez wiele lat praktyki boleśnie przekonał się o tym, że chemioterapia i radioterapia nie przynoszą prawdziwych rezultatów, a dzieci po prostu umierają. Zawsze niezmiernie bulwersował go fakt, że onkologia od ponad 100 lat opiera się na teorii anormalnego podziału komórek, jednak jak dotąd nie zdołała tego udowodnić. „Jeśli ponad wiek nie wystarczył, żeby potwierdzić tą teorię, to może w końcu czas przyznać, że może być ona błędna?” – powiedział w jednym z wywiadów. [20] Rak to zaawansowana infekcja grzybicza? Dr Simoncini po latach obserwacji różnych guzów nowotworowych zauważył pomiędzy nimi jeden wspólny mianownik – większość z nich pokrywa warstwa białej pleśni. Tradycyjna medycyna twierdzi, że okolice guzów nowotworowych (ze względu na ich kwaśny odczyn) są po prostu sprzyjającym środowiskiem dla rozwoju grzybów (które najlepiej rozmnażają się w kwasowym otoczeniu). Dr Simoncini wysnuł jednak teorię, że być może to właśnie grzyby (a nie anormalny podział komórek) są prawdziwą przyczyną nowotworów, a narastające guzy są jedynie reakcją organizmu na rozwijającą się infekcję (komórki dzielą się, żeby się bronić). Ponieważ na oddziale onkologii dziecięcej stosowano roztwór wody z sodą oczyszczoną do przemywania buzi dzieci, które zmagały się grzybicą ust, dr Simoncini wiedział, że jest to skuteczny środek przeciwgrzybiczy. Postanowił więc wypróbować go w terapii raka, co przyniosło zaskakująco dobre rezultaty. Podczas swoich wykładów, dr Simoncini pokazuje bardzo wiele nagrań z kolonoskopii, bronchoskopii, gastroskopii czy torakoskopii, na których wyraźnie widać białe guzy nowotworowe pomniejszające się w krótkim czasie po aplikacji roztworu sody oczyszczonej. Zauważalne rezultaty widać nawet w ciągu kilku dni. Dodam tylko, że dr Simoncini zwrócił się do włoskiego rządu z prośbą o przeprowadzenie oficjalnych badań klinicznych, które potwierdziłyby skuteczność proponowanej przez niego metody leczenia. Żadnych testów jednak nie przeprowadzono, zamiast tego wszczęto postępowanie sądowe z powodu leczenia pacjentów niezatwierdzonymi oficjalnie metodami. Ostatecznie zakończyło się to dla niego utratą licencji lekarskiej. Wykład dr Simoncini – film Nie ma sensu pisać więcej na temat Tullio Simoncini i jego teorii, bo najlepiej jest samemu zobaczyć jego wykład. Zachęcam do obejrzenia poniższych filmów: Naturalne leczenie raka sodą – dr Tullio Simoncini Naturalne leczenie raka sodą – dr Tullio Simoncini Jak powiązane są badania dr Ratha i teoria dr Simoncini? Od razu zaznaczam, że przechodzimy teraz do części, w której nie będę opisywać solidnych dowodów, a jedynie moje wnioski. Szukając wspólnego mianownika pomiędzy doświadczeniami dr Simoncini a badaniami dr Ratha, natrafiłam na informacje, które (moim zdaniem) potwierdzają, że obie teorie są ze sobą powiązane. Candida albicans rozprzestrzenia się poprzez trawienie kolagenu Nawiąże teraz do artykułu napisanego przez dr n. med. Mirosława Masteja, w którym napisano: „grzyb wytwarza i uwalnia do podłoża szereg innych enzymów trawiennych, np. proteinazy, które niszczą białka, w tym kolagen. Jak wiadomo kolagen jest najważniejszym białkiem tkanki łącznej i spaja (klei) nasze wszystkie tkanki i narządy. Rozpuszczając kolagen, grzyb po pierwsze zdobywa pożywienie (rozpuszczone cząsteczki białka), a po drugie ułatwia sobie dalszą penetrację i rozrost w kierunku, z którego usunął kolagen. Jeśli uznamy kolagen za rodzaj muru i ogrodzenia, to proteinazy grzyba rozkruszają ten mur do luźnych cegieł i kamieni (aminokwasy z rozpadniętego białka) dzięki czemu grzyb swobodnie wkracza za mury obronne.” [21] Czy nie uważacie, że dr Masteja przedstawia ekspansję Candida Albicans w dokładnie taki sam sposób jak naukowcy z Instytutu Medycyny Komórkowej dr Ratha opisują rozprzestrzenianie się komórek nowotworowych? W obu przypadkach mamy enzymy, które rozpuszczają kolagen i torują sobie tym samym drogę ekspansji. Na dodatek, jak czytamy w publikacji Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases during Experimental Candida albicans Keratitis, przy zakażeniu grzybiczym następuje produkcja MMP-9 [22] – wg dr Ratha jednego z kluczowych enzymów wytwarzanych przez komórki rakowe. Grzyby są ignorowane przez lekarzy i uważane za niegroźne Dr Masteja w swoim artykule zwraca także uwagę na pewną bardzo niepokojącą rzecz – mimo, że istnieją niezliczone dowody naukowe na to, że Candida Albicans są niebezpieczne dla naszego zdrowia i mogą powodować infekcję wielu różnych narządów, większość lekarzy całkowicie je lekceważy. Stan rzeczy najlepiej obrazuje fakt, że przeważająca część naszego społeczeństwa ma zagrzybione jelita – tymczasem białe plechy wyraźnie widoczne podczas kolonoskopii są przez lekarzy całkowicie ignorowane i uznawane za niegroźne. „Pewna pielęgniarka, asystująca od lat przy kolonoskopiach, na moją uwagę, że biało-kremowe naloty, plamy, rozlane, nieregularne w różnych miejscach śluzówki jelita grubego mogą być koloniami Candida albo grzybnią wrastającą w ścianę jelita, odpowiedziała ‘przecież wszyscy tak mają’. Ona sama wiele lat temu zapytała lekarza, który wykonywał setki kolonoskopii, czemu tak jest. Lekarz odpowiedział, że w kolonoskopii wszyscy szukają raka, polipów, owrzodzeń, więc kto by się przejmował jakimiś białymi nalotami na śluzówce, skoro ‘wszyscy je mają’. Pobrane wycinki poddawane są rzadko badaniom mikologicznym, a nawet jeśli wykażą grzyba Candida, to uznaje się go za fizjologiczny nieomal składnik mikrobioty… i stoimy z wiedzą w miejscu od lat” – pisze dr Masteja. [22] Jeśli rak to rzeczywiście infekcja grzybicza (a moim zdaniem wiele na to wskazuje) to współczesna medycyna, pozwala mu się beztrosko rozwijać aż do momentu, w którym (w ramach reakcji obronnej) komórki zaczynają się dzielić i powstaje tym samym guz. W dodatku, skoro lekarze nie uwzględniają informacji o rozwoju pleśni w wynikach badań, trudno jest zauważyć zależność między nowotworem a wcześniejszym występowaniem kolonii Candida albicans. Dlaczego grzyby są ignorowane? Osoby, które już wcześniej zastanawiały się nad tym w jakim kierunku idzie tradycyjna medycyna, nie są pewnie specjalnie zdziwione ignorancją lekarzy. Jak w jednym z wywiadów przyznała dr Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, koncerny farmaceutyczne (które rocznie czerpią miliardowe zyski z chemioterapii), wywierają ogromy wpływ na medycynę, polityków i media. Pewien sposób rozumowania narzucany jest już na etapie szkół medycznych, które „kształcą lekarzy w dziedzinie farmakologii, a nie roli żywienia. Młodzi lekarze nie mają dostatecznej wiedzy o tym, jak ważne są mikroelementy dla zdrowia. Poza tym poddani są presji, by nie odbiegać od ustalonych standardów.” [5] Publikacje naukowe łączące Candida albicans z nowotworami W publikacji [Research progress of Candida albicans on malignant transformation of oral mucosal diseases] możemy przeczytać, że “badania epidemiologiczne wykazały, że Candida albicans jest ściśle powiązany z nowotworami złośliwymi jamy ustnej. Doświadczenia na zwierzętach dowiodły również, że zakażenie Candida albicans może sprzyjać rozwojowi karcynogenezy nabłonka jamy ustnej. Obecne badania ujawniły kilka mechanizmów zaangażowanych w ten proces, w tym niszczenie bariery nabłonkowej, wytwarzanie substancji rakotwórczych (nitrozoaminy, aldehyd octowy), wywoływanie przewlekłego stanu zapalnego, aktywację odpowiedzi immunologicznej itp. Jednak obecne badania nad mechanizmami są wciąż niewystarczające, a niektóre hipotezy pozostają kontrowersyjne”. [23] Z kolei w publikacji Candida albicans and cancer: Can this yeast induce cancer development or progression? możemy przeczytać, że Candida Albicans nie tylko jest jednym z czynników powiązanych z rozwojem raka, ale także zwiększa ryzyko przerzutów. [24] Równowaga kwasowo-zasadowa kluczowa w zapobieganiu raka? Zakładając, że nowotwór faktycznie spowodowany jest infekcją grzybiczą, pierwszym krokiem jaki powinniśmy wykonać w celu zapobiegania tej chorobie jest utrzymanie odpowiedniej równowagi kwasowo-zasadowej. Według książki zatytułowanej Przewodnik odkwaszania organizmu napisanej przez Susan E. Brown (doktora antropologii medycznej oraz certyfikowanego dietetyka, która przy pisaniu książki współpracowała z wieloma innymi naukowcami) niskie pH organizmu (będące wynikiem nieodpowiedniej diety) negatywnie wpływa na układ odpornościowy oraz sprzyja rozmnażaniu różnorodnych patogenów, w tym właśnie grzybów. Każdy pokarm (gdy po spożyciu zostaje poddany procesom metabolicznym) wywołuje w naszym ciele efekt kwasotwórczy lub zasadotwórczy. Prawidłowa dieta, powinna być skomponowana tak, aby produkty zasadotwórcze (głównie owoce, warzywa, niektóre ziarna) stanowiły większą część spożywanych pokarmów (60-80%) natomiast żywność kwasotwórcza (mięso, nabiał, alkohol, kawa) powinna stanowić jedynie 20-40% naszego jadłospisu. Niestety w dzisiejszych czasach jest zupełnie odwrotnie, na skutek czego większość społeczeństwa doświadcza zakwaszenia organizmu (zwanego fachowo kwasicą metaboliczną niskiego stopnia). Stan ten powiązany jest z rozwojem wielu chorób, osteoporozy, kamieni nerkowych i infekcji grzybiczych. [25] Więcej na ten temat można przeczytać w artykule o równowadze kwasowo-zasadowej. Szczegółowe informacje na temat samego odżywiania (w tym obszerną tabelę żywności opisującą efekt poszczególnych produktów na stan równowagi kwasowo-zasadowej) można znaleźć w tekście o diecie zasadowej. Medycyna tradycyjna i badania naukowe potwierdzają, że warzywa i owoce zapobiegają rakowi Wpływ odżywania na zdrowie jest bezsprzecznym, udowodnionym naukowo faktem. To właśnie dlatego Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia (WHO) oraz inne instytucje (takie jak American Cancer Society czy American Heart Association) rekomendują spożywanie przynajmniej 5 porcji warzyw i owoców dziennie (około 400 g). [26] Jak czytamy na stronie WHO, „dieta bogata w owoce i warzywa może mieć niezależny efekt ochronny przed wieloma nowotworami. Regularna aktywność fizyczna i utrzymanie prawidłowej masy ciała w połączeniu ze zdrową dietą znacznie zmniejszają ryzyko raka”. [27] Istnieje wiele badań, które wskazują, że warzywa i owoce mogą zapobiegać rakowi Na pewno nie raz zwróciliście uwagę na to, że w artykułach poświęconych poszczególnym warzywom i owocom, praktycznie zawsze natrafia się na informację o tym, że wykazują one właściwości przeciwnowotworowe. Te twierdzenia nie są bezpodstawne – potwierdzają je badania naukowe. To właśnie dlatego takie instytucje jak Światowa Organizacja Zdrowia przyznają, że spożywanie warzyw i owoców jest kluczowe w zapobieganiu raka. Poniżej przedstawiam przykładowe publikacje potwierdzające antynowotworowe działanie wybranych warzyw. Nie będę zagłębiać się już w ten temat, bo artykuł jest już i tak bardzo długi i wyczerpujący. Podaję linki dla osób zainteresowanych lub wciąż niedowierzających: Anticancer Potential of Citrus Juices and Their Extracts: A Systematic Review of Both Preclinical and Clinical Studies, NCBI, Cytotoxic effect of the red beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) extract compared to doxorubicin (Adriamycin) in the human prostate (PC-3) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cell lines, PubMed, Effective Medicinal Plant in Cancer Treatment, Part 2: Review Study, NCBI, Phytochemicals of garlic: Promising candidates for cancer therapy, ScienceDirect, Ginger Extract (Zingiber Officinale) has Anti-Cancer and Anti-Inflammatory Effects on Ethionine-Induced Hepatoma Rats, NCBI, Anticancer Activities of Nigella Sativa (Black Cumin), NCBI, Anticancer effects of sweet potato protein on human colorectal cancer cells, PubMed, Evaluation of Effectiveness of Herbal Medication in Cancer Care: A Review Study, NCBI, Fruit and vegetables and cancer risk: a review of southern European studies, PubMed, Powyższe publikacje są oczywiście przykładowe. Gdybym chciała zebrać tutaj wszystkie opracowania naukowe potwierdzające antynowotworowe właściwości warzyw i owoców, pewnie zabrakłoby mi życia. Wybrane publikacje dr Ratha i dr Niedzwiecki w PubMed: A Specific Mixture of Nutrients Suppresses Ovarian Cancer A-2780 Tumor Incidence, Growth, and Metastasis to Lungs, NCBI, Anticancer Efficacy of Polyphenols and Their Combinations, PubMed, Ascorbate supplementation inhibits growth and metastasis of B16FO melanoma and 4T1 breast cancer cells in vitamin C-deficient mice, PubMed, Antitumor effect of ascorbic acid, lysine, proline, arginine, and green tea extract on bladder cancer cell line T-24, PubMed, In vivo and in vitro antitumor effect of a unique nutrient mixture on lung cancer cell line A-549, PubMed, Progress of Tumor Growth and Metastasis After Inoculation of B16FO Melanoma Cells in Kidney of Female Nude Mice Is Inhibited by a Novel Nutrient Mixture, PubMed, Micronutrient synergy – a new tool in effective control of metastasis and other key mechanisms of cancer, NCBI, In vitro and in vivo antitumorigenic activity of a mixture of lysine, proline, ascorbic acid, and green tea extract on human breast cancer lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, PubMed, Anticancer effect of lysine, proline, arginine, ascorbic acid and green tea extract on human renal adenocarcinoma line 786-0, PubMed, UWAGA: Jeśli masz jakiekolwiek uwagi do tego artykuły, zapraszam do dyskusji w komentarzach poniżej. kiekolwike uwagi do artykułu? Zostaw wpis w sekcji komentarzy poniżej. Zachęcam także do polubienia mojego konta na Facebooku i obserwowania na Instagramie. Pozdrawiam, Ania z bloga Zielona Zasada Źródła: 1. What Causes Cancer?, Stanford Health Care, 2. The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies, PubMed, 3. 30-day mortality after systemic anticancer treatment for breast and lung cancer in England: a population-based, observational study, The Lancet Oncology, 4. Cancer, Our World in Data, 5. Leki przeciwnowotworowe powodują rozwój raka – czyli pacjent w matrixie, Medycyna Komórkowa, 6. Dr. Rath’s Biography, Dr. Rath Research Institute, 7. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 48-49. 8. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 80. 9. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 116 10. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 124-125. 11. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 126-127. 12. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 128-129. 13. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 136-117 14. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 138- 139. 15. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 148 – 149. 16. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 155-159. 17. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 88. 18. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 118- 119. 19. Dr Matthias Rath, dr Aleskandra Niedzwiecki, Zwycięstwo nad rakiem, Wydanie II, 2011, s. 94. 20. Dr Simoncini Full interview About Cancer and Baking Soda, YouTube, 21. Candida – Grzybnia wewnątrz nas, hipoalergiczni, 22. Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases during Experimental Candida albicans Keratitis, NCBI, 23. Research progress of Candida albicans on malignant transformation of oral mucosal diseases, PubMed, 24. Candida albicans and cancer: Can this yeast induce cancer development or progression?, PubMed, ­25. Dr Susan E. Brown, Larry Trivieri JR, Przewodnik Odkwaszania organizmu – Wpływ Żywności na Twój Bilans Kwasowo-Zasadowy, Wydanie II, Białystok 2015. 26. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption around the world, WHO, 27. Cancer, WHO, Data ostatniej aktualizacji:
Rak to uleczalny grzyb – tak twierdzi włoski lekarz dr Tullio Simoncini, który sprzeciwił się Wielkiej Farmacji i upublicznił swoje odkrycie skutecznego leczenia raka – grzyba wywołanego przez
Site Visit Summary Dr. Tullio Simoncini (oncologist), Rome, Italy Date: April 23, 2008 Website: Cure Naturali Cancro Site visitors: Emory Oney and Ferdinando Pisani Clinic location Dr. Tullio Simoncini uses multiple clinics in Rome. His patients usually come to Rome and stay in a hotel close to Dr. Simoncini's home and he treats them at local clinics on an outpatient basis. We visited Dr. Simoncini at his home in Rome. Philosophy and type of treatment Dr. Simoncini started his personal war against cancer in medical school when he heard cancer described as a terrible and mysterious monster. It occurred to Dr. Simoncini that cancer acted just like a fungus and if it could be a fungus, it could be treated. Dr. Simoncini knew the extreme sensiti

Antynowotworowa terapia dr Simonciniego. Zdaniem dr Simonciniego najlepszą metodą całkowitego usunięcia nowotworu jest doprowadzenie do bezpośredniego kontaktu z sodą oczyszczoną. W przypadku nowotworów narządów wewnętrznych najlepsze efekty przynosi podawanie jej bezpośrednio do tętnic w odpowiednich dawkach. Tullio Simoncini

Dr. Peter Glidden talks about the incredibly low success rate for chemotherapy as a cancer treatment “To sell chemotherapy as a “therapy” is most likely the biggest deceit in the history of medicine. Whoever masterminded this chemo-torture deserves a monument in hell.” Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer Dr. Tullio Simoncini: Simple cure for cancer Dr. Simoncini discovered that the cause of this terrible illness is a fungus and tried hard to persuade scientists how wrong are the actual theories on cancer. His therapy based on the strongest antifungal substance, sodium bicarbonate, is harmless and very effective and should be adopted all over the world. Dr. Tullio Simoncini In 1996 Dr. Simoncini received his in Philosophy from La Sapienza University. From 2000 to 2004 he devoted his focus to Oncology, also at La Sapienza his medical career, Dr. Simoncini pursued his personal theories regarding cancer. His first terminal patient, who went into remission in 1981, is still alive and well today. Study showed that sodium bicarbonate is not only a safer, cheaper cancer remedy, it is more effective than dichloroacetate.. Dr Tullio Simoncini explaining the simple cure for cancer Simoncini’s personality is pervaded by a strong humanitarianism which triggered him to reflect on how little and inadequate medicine’s fundamental knowledge is, as shown by the impotence of medicine when faced by the pain of patients. This empathy for the pain of others has been the constant motivator on the path of his personal life. He’s always travelling throughout the Italy to explain his theory in congresses, conferences and interviews, and to show how many patients healed from cancer.. High success rate of baking soda killing cancer. Tullio Simoncini on video and accounts of those who have experienced his treatments Le site Web du Dr. Simoncini : Simoncini Cancer Therapy - treat cancer as fungus a revolutionairy therapy in the treatment of cancer share Cancer is the most important problem in medicine, not only because of its size, but especially because of the long symptomatological line that comes with this disease, especially in its more advanced phases, and the state of extreme psychological suffering which both the patient and their relatives are victims of. It is no coincidence that the American president Richard Nixon in far-off 1971 proclaimed a real war against the “disease of the century”. Since then, this war has absorbed, worldwide, a quantity of economic, scientific and human resources which exceeds the limit of any imagination, but the results – it is useless to hide it – are a failure. Apart from the continuously renewed commitments, the repeated promises, and the supposedly miraculous most recent findings, there is very little that is concrete: the cause of cancer is and remains unknown. Cancer and fungus After many years research I have come to the conclusion that cancer is an infection and actually a fungal infection. I have never believed that genetics lies behind the occurrence of cancer. I came to this conclusion, and long-term research and successful results support my theory that cancer is caused by a fungus, in particular the Candida fungus in all its variants. Candida Albicans Candida causes fungal infections and tumors in man. It is always Candida because all other fungi are family of Candida. The fungi that threaten people may differ by about 2 to 5 percent. Fungi must have the same genetic structure in order to be able to attack the human kind. The variants depend on the difference in human tissues. But it is always a Candida fungus that causes tumors in humans. Fungal infections have been known for years. The Candida fungus is always found in patients. This type of fungus is found in about 97 to 98% of cases. All research points to the presence of the Candida fungus. What matters is the correct interpretation. What is important is the correct interpretation. Candida in cancer patients is usually interpreted as a consequence of the weakening and of the exhaustion of the organism because of the new and abnormal growth. It is not correct to think that the cancer comes first, and then the Candida. My supposition is that the Candida is present first, penetrates the organism and causes the tumor. The Candida fungus is already there. So candida is not a post hoc but an ante hoc cause. Skin cancer and psoriasis In the case of skin cancer and psoriasis I have developed a different protocol. I hereby do not use Sodium bicarbonate, but kill the fungus with iodine tincture in a solution of 7%. Using this protocol, good results are achieved with topical cancers. When the cancer is based deeper in the tissue, injections of sodium bicarbonate around the cancer could be neccessary. Le site Web du Dr. Simoncini : Simoncini Cancer Therapy baking soda Sodium bicarbonate, also known as baking soda, is promoted by some alternative practitioners as a cancer treatment. This treatment is based on the theory that cancer is caused by a form of yeast infection and that sodium bicarbonate can kill the yeast. This claim is not supported by science or clinical evidence and is contrary to widely-accepted basic facts of oncology and microbiology. Sodium bicarbonate is used as a conventional treatment for disorders in which the blood is too acidic. It is also used as an over-the-counter remedy for heartburn, although not so much today as it was in the past. Available scientific evidence does not support claims that cancer is caused by infection with a type of yeast known as Candida albicans. Available scientific evidence also does not support the idea that sodium bicarbonate works as a treatment for any form of cancer or that it cures yeast or fungal infections. There is substantial evidence, however, that these claims are false. Although sodium bicarbonate is safe when used in proper doses and as directed as a conventional treatment, high doses can cause serious problems or even death. Sodium bicarbonate is promoted by some alternative practitioners, especially Dr. Tullio Simoncini, as a cure for all types of cancer. This claim is made on several websites, in videos of Dr. Simoncini posted on the Internet, and in a book written by Dr. Simoncini. Sodium bicarbonate is given by some alternative practitioners by mouth (orally) or into a vein (intravenously). It is also given intra-arterially (into an artery supplying blood to the tumor) and is sometimes given as a solution directly through the trachea (windpipe) into the lungs to treat lung cancer. Conventional cancer treatments roughly cost $ 100,000. Alternative methods cost much less, while their effect is much higher. That is why more and more people are seeking for alternative ways of treating cancer. Below we describe several therapies to treat cancer with bicarbonate of soda, which have helped hundreds of people. However, it is important to understand that cancer is a serious disease, and that such treatment necessarily must work under the supervision of an alternative experienced physician. Therapy with baking soda (by Dr. Simoncini) Italian oncologist recommends the use of baking soda with no aluminium additives or pharmaceutical baking soda in the treatment of cancer. How does the therapy work: sodium bicarbonate drastically increases the alkalinity of the blood, which destroys the candida (which according to the theory is the causer of cancer). Method of treating In cases of cancer of the stomach, colon, rectal and oral cavity: Take one teaspoon of baking soda in the morning and one in the evening with a glass of water, during one month. After that, the cancer should disappear. Do not use this therapy for more than 3-4 weeks! However, in most cases, the therapy by requests a medical assistance, in the form of injections or intravenous therapy. For intravenous therapy: 500 ml of a 5% solution of baking soda is given directly into the vein, every day. The treatment should last for 6 days, then a break of 6 days is made. So you need to continue until you get a total of 24 infusions. Then check whether the cancer has retired. Therapy with baking soda and maple syrup by dr. Jim Kelmun Dr. Jim Kelmun is a conventional medicine doctor. However, he had his own special recipe for the treatment of cancer, which he shared among people suffering from cancer, who were discharged from hospitals to die at home. Surprisingly, most of them were healed of cancer and lived for many years afterwards. “Other doctors have told me that I have less than 6 months to live. But Dr. Jim gave me this recipe and the cancer had disappeared in a few months, which was confirmed by medicals recordings. “- Ian Roadhouse, a farmer The idea of mixing baking soda with maple syrup may seem ridiculous and paradoxical, since cancer cells feed on sugar. However, in this case, the sugar acts in a different manner. Cancer cells fail to use sugar for growth, as soda immediately kills them. In this case, maple syrup operates in such a way that it increases the blood glucose level, in order to directly inject soda into the cells. It is assumed that therapy with bicarbonate of soda and maple syrup acts like chemotherapy, killing cancer cells, but without any harm to the organism. According to the testimonies of many cured, this therapy is simple, effective and can be combined with other natural ways to treat cancer. Again, note that the therapy should be administered under the supervision of alternative doctors. Procedure: Mix one part baking soda with three parts maple syrup Heat and stir in a very low heat for 10 minutes - Take 3 teaspoons a day for 1-2 months - Avoid meat, sugar and white flour during the therapy How does the baking soda work? Baking soda (wothout aluminum) is a safe, effective and inexpensive way of treating cancer. Soda drastically increases the alkalinity of the body, as it submits more oxygen to the cancer cells than they can handle. The fact is that cancer cells can not survive in conditions of high oxygen levels in the blood. Studies have already confirmed that soda really affects the PH balance of cancer cells. “The treatment with sodium bicarbonate can be carried out orally, via aerosol, intravenously, or through a catheter, to be able to directly act on cancer” – claims Tullio Simoncini. “Such therapy may be effective in treating many tumors, but other serious types of tumors – such as cancers of the brain or bones – unfortunately, remain intacted by the therapy.” Every Cancer Can be Cured in Weeks explains Dr. Leonard Coldwell Dr. Leonard Coldwell states that every cancer can be cured within 16 weeks. Dr. Coldwell states how that’s possible in this video. He recommends using natural cancer cures as opposed to traditional cancer treatments.. Simoncini therapy Dr. Simoncini, an oncologist in Rome, Italy has pioneered sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) therapy as a means to treat cancer. The fundamental theory behind this treatment lies in the fact that, despite a number of variable factors, the formation and spreading of tumors is simply the result of the presence of a fungus. Sodium bicarbonate, unlike other anti-fungal remedies to which the fungus can become immune, is extremely diffusible and retains its ability to penetrate the tumor, due to the speed at which the sodium bicarbonate disintegrates the tumor. This speed makes fungi’s adaptability impossible, rendering it defenseless. Selective arteriography The sodium bicarbonate solution is administered directly on the tumor, if possible. Otherwise, it can be administered by selective arteriography, which basically means selecting specific arteries through which the solution is administered, which subsequently dissolves the tumor. Selective arteriography represents a very powerful anti-fungal weapon that is painless, leaves no after effects, and has very low risks. It is possible to reach almost all organs with a sodium bicarbonate solution, resulting in treatment that is harmless, fast, and effective. Dr. Huber’s intravenous nutrient cancer treatment Dr. Tullio Simoncini is a medical doctor in Italy who has done more than anyone to explore the uses of sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) as an alkaline therapy against cancer. It is known that cancer creates and favors an acid environment and because of this, Dr. Simoncini and others have used baking soda as an alkaline therapeutic agent. The way that acidity seems to protect cancer is not fully understood. It seems that cytotoxic T-cells, which may attack cancer cells under normal conditions, are inactivated in an acid extracellular fluid. Also, the type of acidity that cancer produces, lactic acid, stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. This is like a highway project, which enables a tumor to build the blood vessels that it needs to bring the nutrients for it to survive. So the tumor creates an environment in which it can then exist comfortably. Baking Soda’s Alkalinity Fights Cancer’s Acidity At a pH of about 10, sodium bicarbonate is an antidote to this acidity. It can be used clinically in sterile, intravenous form. This is a liquid, sterile baking soda. The sodium bicarbonate cancer treatment (NaHCO3) is well-tolerated, even with frequent repeated dosing. As baking soda, we will often recommend that our cancer patients take ¼ to ½ teaspoonful in water orally a few times per day as an adjunct to our therapies. This is not suitable for everybody, and may have repercussions in various organ systems if taken to excess. We are not advising anyone to do this unless they have been a patient at our clinic, and we recommend it to specific individuals. Also, there is risk of aluminum contamination with some available brands of baking soda, so one must be cautious with this. An important part of our intravenous therapies against cancer is sterile, pure, intravenous baking soda. This is one of numerous anti-cancer nutrients that we use in our intravenous infusions. A Concurrence Between Cancer And Candida Earlier researchers have found a concurrence between cancer and candida. In Dr. Simoncini’s book, Cancer is a Fungus he notes some similarities between the two. Primarily, both are intractable diseases, each very hard to get rid of. Dr. Simoncini notes that each forms a solid mass of low penetrability, unlike the dispersed forms of bacterial and viral infections in the body or body fluids. Dr. Simoncini notes the problem of surface area in addressing these infections. Whereas bacterial and viral infections are dispersed in the solutions of bodily compartments, and likewise, antibiotics and other anti-microbials dispersed in the same solutions have access to each microbe. A solid mass on the other hand, is approached by one of two routes: either the most superficial layer of the outer surface, or by way of any blood vessels that course through it. In the case of a neoplasm, the approach of approximating the most superficial layer has the effect of challenging the survival of the cancer only enough to induce the genetic changes that make the tumor more resilient to further assault by the same or similar agents. Therefore, a productive route to the core of the cancer, a more threatening assault on its survival, is by way of the bloodstream. Is Cancer A Fungus? As for whether cancer is fundamentally a kind of fungus, the jury is still out. However, it is useful to know that not only does sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) disrupt the comfortable environment of tumors, but it also has anti-fungal effect. G. Edward Griffin – The Collectivist Conspiracy In this exclusive 80 minute video interview, legendary conspiracy author G. Edward Griffin explains how his research, which spans no less than 5 decades, has revealed a banking elite obsessed with enforcing a world government under a collectivist model that will crush individualism and eventually institute martial law as a response to the inevitable backlash that will be generated as a result of a fundamental re-shaping of society. Griffin discusses the similarities between the extreme left and the extreme right in the false political paradigm and how this highlights a recurring theme – collectivism. Collectivism is the opposite of individualism and believes that the interests of the individual must be sacrificed for the greater good of the greater number, explains Griffin, uniting the doctrines of communism and fascism. Both the Republican and Democrat parties in the United States are committed to advancing collectivism and this is why the same policies are followed no matter who is voted in to the White House. “All collectivist systems eventually deteriorate into a police state because that’s the only way you can hold it together,” warns Griffin. Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University Professor and mentor to former president Bill Clinton, explained in his books Tragedy and Hope and The Anglo-American Establishment, how the elite maintained a silent dictatorship while fooling people into thinking they had political freedom, by creating squabbles between the two parties in terms of slogans and leadership, while all the time controlling both from the top down and pursuing the same agenda. Griffin documents how the Tea Party, after its beginnings as a grass roots movement, was later hijacked by the Republicans through the likes of Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. Pointing out how Republicans and Democrats agree on the most important topics, such as US foreign policy, endless wars in the Middle East, and the dominance of the private banking system over the economy, Griffin lays out how the left-right hoax is used to steer the destiny of America. Griffin also talks at length on a myriad of other important subjects, such as the move towards a Chinese-style censored Internet, the demonization of the John Birch Society as a racist extremist group, the Hegelian dialectic, the power of tax-exempt foundations and the Council on Foreign Relations, the movement towards world government, and the question of whether the elite are really worried about the growing awareness of their agenda amongst Americans.. David Icke's Masterwork!!!!!!!! 2014!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HD A World Without Cancer — the Story of Vitamin B-17 by G. Edward Griffin This 1974 documentary by G. Edward Griffin explains the hypothesis that cancer is a “deficiency disease” that is brought about by the absence of Nitrilocides from Vitamin B-17 in people’s diets, and it shows evidence that a related medical treatment known as Laetrile is able to often cure cancers that have already started. Various issues are discussed including an explanation of the theory, evidence of the treatment being effective including case histories, and an explanation of ulterior motives causing the medical establishment to inappropriately be opposed to such treatment.. Stage 4 Cancer Gone With Baking Soda Treatment The Use of Baking Soda in Oncology Dr. Tullio Simoncini, an Italian oncologist, regularly treats his cancer patients with baking soda. In his experience, oral, intravenous and aerosol delivery of sodium bicarbonate are effective in treatment of breast and prostate cancers as well as other types of cancer except for brain cancer. Although Dr. Simoncini believes oral sodium bicarbonate is most appropriate for cancers affecting the digestive tract, other oncologists and cancer patients such as Vernon have proven that oral sodium bicarbonate can indeed effectively treat cancer affecting deep-seated organs. Dr. Sircus also recommends oral administration of baking soda. Many of his patients debate whether to mix it with maple syrup, molasses, honey, water or any other beverage. Since normal cells are starved in cancer patients, the oncologist recommends healthy energy sources such as honey, black strap molasses and maple syrup. Dr. Simoncini, on the other hand, gives glucose intravenously along with sodium bicarbonate for the same purpose. The Baking Soda Formula for Cancer To make the baking soda natural cancer remedy at home, you need maple syrup, molasses or honey to go along with the baking soda. In Dr. Sircus’ book, he documented how one patient used baking soda and blackstrap molasses to fight the prostate cancer that had metastasized to his bones. On the first day, the patient mixed 1 teaspoon of baking soda with 1 teaspoon of molasses in a cup of water. He took this for another 3 days after which his saliva pH read and his urine pH read Encouraged by these results, the patient took the solution 2 times on day 5 instead of once daily. And from day 6 – 10, he took 2 teaspoons each of baking soda and molasses twice daily. By the 10th day, the patient’s pH had risen to and the only side effects experienced were headaches and night sweat (similar to cesium therapy). The next day, the patient had a bone scan and too other medical tests. His results showed that his PSA (prostate-specific antigen, the protein used to determine the severity of prostate enlargement and prostate cancer) level was down from at the point of diagnosis to Another baking soda formula recommends mixing 90 teaspoons of maple syrup with 30 teaspoons of baking soda. To do this, the maple syrup must be heated to become less viscous. Then the baking syrup is added and stirred for 5 minutes until it is fully dissolved. This preparation should provide about 10-day worth of the baking soda remedy. 5 – 7 teaspoons per day is the recommended dose for cancer patients. Care should be taken when using the baking soda remedy to treat cancer. This is because sustaining a high pH level can itself cause metabolic alkalosis and electrolyte imbalance. These can result in edema and also affect the heart and blood pressure. Source: World's Top Doctor! How to Heal Cancer, Cure Disease and More! (Dr. Leonard Coldwell) How to treat cancer - Cancer is Fungus - Dr Tullio Simoncini Dr. Simoncini, an oncologist in Rome, Italy has pioneered sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) therapy as a means to treat cancer. The fundamental theory behind this treatment lies in the fact that, despite a number of variable factors, the formation and spreading of tumors is simply the result of the presence of a fungus. Baking Soda Cancer Studies and pH Medicine Dr. Mark Pagel, baking soda and cancer researcher. University of Arizona Cancer Center member Dr. Mark Pagel will receive a $2 million grant from the National Institutes of Health to study the effectiveness of personalized baking soda cancer treatment for breast cancer. In other words, clinical trials on the use of oral baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) for breast cancer treatments are about to start![1] Obviously there are people in the know who have understood that sodium bicarbonate, that same stuff that can save a person’s life in the emergency room in a heartbeat, is a primary cancer treatment option of the safest and most effective kind. Of course I feel vindicated for everything I wrote in Sodium Bicarbonate – Rich Man’s Poor Man’s Cancer Treatment, which still stands as the only full medical review on the subject of using simple baking soda in the practice of medicine. When taken orally with water, especially water with high magnesium content, and when used transdermally in medicinal baths, sodium bicarbonate becomes a first-line medicinal for the treatment of cancer, kidney disease, diabetes, influenza and even the common cold. It is also a powerful buffer against radiation exposure, so everyone should be up to speed on its use. Everybody’s physiology is under heavy nuclear attack from strong radioactive winds that are circling the northern hemisphere. Actually it is no surprise that a University of Arizona researcher received this grant because there has been cancer research going on for years there. Dr. Robert J. Gillies and his colleagues have already demonstrated that pre-treatment of mice with baking soda results in the alkalinization of the area around tumors. The same researchers reported that bicarbonate increases tumor pH and also inhibits spontaneous metastases in mice with breast cancer.[2] It also reduces the rate of lymph node involvement. I recently published about fungal infections, and breast cancer has been found to be associated with increased frequency of mold-fermented cheese consumption.[3] Fungi produce toxic metabolites called mycotoxins[4] that can cause cancer. Aflatoxin is a mycotoxin with carcinogenic potency that is found in inferior peanut butter and other nut and dairy products. Researchers in 1993 examined human breast cancer tissue and found significant carcinogenic aflatoxin within the cancer tissue implicating aflatoxin and thus fungus as a cause of breast cancer.[5] The pH level of our internal fluids affects every cell in our body. Chronic over-acidity corrodes body tissue, and if left unchecked will interrupt all cellular activities and functions. In other words, over-acidity interferes with life itself. It is at the root of cancer. Sodium bicarbonate medical treatments are the time honored method to “speed up” the return of the body’s bicarbonate levels to normal. Sodium bicarbonate happens to be one of our most useful medicines as it treats the basic acid-alkaline axis of human physiology. Baking Soda and PH Medicine The pH of our tissues and body fluids is crucial and central because it affects and mirrors the state of our health or our inner cleanliness. The closer the pH is to the higher our level of health and wellbeing. Staying within this range dramatically increases our ability to resist acute illnesses like colds and flues as well as the onset of cancer and other diseases. Keeping our pH within a healthy range also involves necessary lifestyle and dietary changes that will protect us over the long term while the use of sodium bicarbonate gives us a jump-start toward increased alkalinity. The pH scale is like a thermometer showing increases and decreases in the acid and alkaline content of fluids. Deviations above or below a pH range in the tightly controlled blood can signal potentially serious and dangerous symptoms or states of disease. When the body can no longer effectively neutralize and eliminate the acids, it relocates them within the body’s extra-cellular fluids and connective tissue cells directly compromising cellular integrity. Conversely when the body becomes too alkaline from too much bicarbonate in the blood, metabolic alkalosis occurs, which can lead to severe consequences if not corrected quickly.[6] Jon Barron presents a way of looking at pH that opens up one of the major benefits of alkaline water: Hydrogen ions tie up oxygen. That means that the more acid a liquid is, the less available the oxygen in it. Every cell in our body requires oxygen for life and to maintain optimum health. Combine that with what we know about hydrogen ions and we see that the more acid the blood (the lower its pH), the less oxygen is available for use by the cells. Without going into a discussion of the chemistry involved, just understand that it’s the same mechanism involved when acid rain “kills” a lake. The fish literally suffocate to death because the acid in the lake “binds up” all of the available oxygen. It’s not that the oxygen has gone anywhere; it’s just no longer available. Conversely, if you raise the pH of the lake (make it more alkaline), oxygen is now available and the lake comes back to life. Incidentally, it’s worth noting that cancer is related to an acid environment (lack of oxygen)—the higher the pH (the more oxygen present in the cells of the body), the harder it is for cancer to thrive. Understanding this is important for two reasons: (1) it reveals one of the primary benefits of alkaline water—more “available” oxygen in the system and (2) it explains why alkaline water helps fight cancer. The ocean, the mother of all life, has an average pH of about The ideal pH for blood sits at about slightly alkaline—not acidic. – Jon Barron Barron concludes: If you’re eating well and living cleanly, then yes, you want to drink water with a naturally occurring pH only slightly above neutral. However, if you are eating the typical Western diet, high in meat, grains, sodas, and sugars that acidify the body, then you have a different problem. Your pH balance is now so far out of normal that you must go beyond normal in the other direction to counter it. My recommendation for daily drinking water pH is about on how acid forming your diet is. Long-term consumption of higher pH water should be reserved for special circumstances. The most famous mountain waters in the world, waters renowned for their healing properties, are highly alkaline. I’m referring to the waters coming down from the Himalayas, and specifically to the waters of the Hunza Valley, which have a pH that runs between 9 and 11. One does not have to be a doctor to practice pH medicine. Every practitioner of the healing arts and every mother and father needs to understand how to use sodium bicarbonate. Bicarbonate deficiency is a real problem that deepens with age so it really does pay to understand and appreciate what baking soda is all about. One Nation Under Drugs – Why I Abandoned The Pharmaceutical Industry As a medicinal chemist, I ignored my suspicion that an insidious and deliberate push to get each and every American hooked on drugs, while at the same time bankrupting them, existed between Big Pharma and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). I enjoyed my work. Drug design paid well and kept me comfortably isolated in a high-tech lab, fully equipped to help me bend and twist matter at will. The last thing I wanted to think of was a plot designed to sabotage health and wealth—while causing untold ecological damage—using my chemistry skills. But over time, experience confirmed my suspicion as fact and revealed something even scarier. Deadly Profiteering My passion for drug design arose from the miracle of emergency medicine, one of humankind’s greatest scientific achievements. Sadly though, medicine is no longer exclusive to emergency use. Today, outside of emergency medicine, it’s being used in a deadly game of profiteering, as heavily documented in my latest book, Over-The-Counter Natural Cures. Herein lies a story of deceit and a chemist’s abandonment of modern medicine. My doubts about modern medicine began while I was employed by Eli Lilly to design a new generation of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) drugs, a class which includes tamoxifen and raloxifene. Initially, they were thought to block estrogen receptors and thereby halt breast cancer. As time progressed, it was learned that they were also capable of activating estrogen receptors and boosting cancer growth. The Journal of the American Medical Association recognized this trend and published, “Our data add to the growing body of evidence that recent long-term use of HRT is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and that such use may be related particularly to lobular tumors.” My task was made clear: Design HRT ‘knock-offs’ that are effective without causing cancer. My attempt to design safer alternatives began with small alterations to the two-dimensional structure of tamoxifen. It was unsuccessful. All chemical cousins acted as cancer fertilizer and after one year, the project was ended. Access to tamoxifen and other HRT meds however, was not. Despite its ability to inflame cancer, tamoxifen continued to be used as the Gold-Standard in breast cancer treatment. As a young naïve chemist, I was determined to learn how such a dangerous drug could get through the prestigious FDA approval process. Checkbook Science Tamoxifen was developed by British company Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), whose pharmaceutical division was later spun off as Astra Zeneca. Knowing that “demand drives drug approval,” ICI established—in partnership with the American Cancer Society–National Breast Cancer Awareness Month! Fueled by fear, women worldwide began pushing for more choices in cancer drugs, and in Big Pharma language, that means more drug approvals. Tamoxifen demand was successfully created and expanded every subsequent year thanks to ICI’s self-serving pink ribbon campaign. But, how did tamoxifen sail past the protective blood-brain barrier of the FDA? A quick lesson in statistical contortionism shows how. Just like chemists manipulate the properties of matter, Big Pharma manipulates studies using “checkbook science.” This allows them to pay for the design and interpretation of clinical trials. Tamoxifen studies were conveniently stopped at five years, the minimum amount of time required for cancer to develop. This successfully hid its cancer causing problem. But just like their pink campaigns, there’s more stink. In 1992, tamoxifen evangelist Dr. Bernard Fisher, working for the National Cancer Institute (NCI), received $68 million in federal money to assess whether the drug could prevent breast cancer. In an effort to make tamoxifen appear safe and effective, Fisher failed to report falsified data and enrollment fraud to the NCI, casting further stench over the study and resulting in his termination as director. The smoke and mirrors showed that tamoxifen reduced breast cancer by 50%. In reality, it was an insignificant absolute difference. Checkbook science isn’t illegal by FDA standards. It’s been going on for over 20 years. Known as the Bayh-Dole Act, US law was amended in 1980 to permit flagrant conflicts of interest, ones that allow the industry to design drug trials and hire experts to conjure up favorable results at will. Once demand was created, and checkbook science in place, the FDA only needed one study to approve tamoxifen in record time–30 days. They did this by hiring advisors with Big Pharma financial ties to sit on its review committee. Failing to do their homework, only ten percent of the case reports from women enrolled in the tamoxifen trials were reviewed by the committee. But, most alarming to me as a chemist, it was still given a green light as a preventive cancer treatment for healthy women! Aiming for wealth, not health, Big Pharma hit the financial bull’s eye. As the Gold-Standard for breast cancer treatment today, generic tamoxifen rakes in billions every year with few noticing its “little cancer problem,” as it became known in our lab. Drug Lobbying – Buying the US Govt. I thought I was getting paid well as a new drug chemist; I was driving a brand new PT Cruiser (which my wife hated), had $15,000 in stock options and was offered a $10,000 incentive to buy a new house. Heck, if I was really good, I would get a $4,500 dollar raise after a year, which equated to a weekly burrito at Chipotle, with guacamole (which is extra), Mountain Dew included. A closer look at the real drug profits however, revealed I wasn’t even making pennies on the pharmaceutical dollar and neither were the biology researchers. Obscene amounts of drug profits were going to the pharmaceutical titans, their shareholders—and even to the FDA. That’s right, rather than being funded solely by taxpayers, our drug administration is being paid by the very industry it’s supposed to regulate. This is legal—courtesy of the Prescription Drug User Fee Act. Today, the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA is dependent on drug companies for nearly half of its funding. Drug lobbying is another slimy practice that greases the “FDA revolving door,” and blurs the line between the drug industry and the US government. According to a report by the Center for Public Integrity, congressmen are outnumbered two to one by lobbyists for the pharmaceutical industry. And many are later put onto the government payroll and vice versa. Total pharmaceutical lobbying in 2009 came to a whopping $267,893,947, enough to feed 502 million starving African children. Instead, it pays to grease the drug approval pipeline via 450 lobbying organizations, 1,743 lobbyists, and 1,113 revolvers (congress and senior congressional staffers who revolve in and out of the private and public sectors). Medical Ghostwriting Doctors can’t keep up with safety and efficacy of tamoxifen or any other drugs being used today. But this hasn’t changed their prescribing habits. Medical ghostwriting, the slimy practice of hiring PhD’s to crank out drug reports that hype benefits and hide negative side effects, has successfully brainwashed most physicians into thinking that “the benefits of drugs outweigh risks.” Once completed, drug companies recruit doctors to put their names on the reports as authors. These reports are then published in respected medical journals. The dangling carrots for this deceitful practice are money and prestige. Ghostwriters earn up to $20,000 per report and doctors receive the acclaim of being published. Ultimately, patients get bad drugs disguised as good medicine resulting in carnage like the Vioxx™ body count–88,000 people died from taking “the safest pain killer,” as it was lauded in ghost written articles.. Source: Dr. Peter Glidden talks about the incredibly low success rate for chemotherapy as a cancer treatment “To sell chemotherapy as a “therapy” is most likely the biggest deceit in the history of medicine. Whoever masterminded this chemo-torture deserves a monument in hell.” Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer Cancer patient after 5 years of Chemo and 120 radiation treatments (Globe and Mail, March 13, 2004) Food - The Ultimate Secret Exposed full version Alex Jones addresses one of the darkest modes of power the globalists have used to control the population– food. The adulteration of the planet’s staple crops, genetically-altered species and intentionally-altered water, food and air all amount to a Eugenics operation to weaken the masses and achieve full spectrum domination. People the world over, but especially in the United States are under chemical attack. Deadly and dangerous toxins ranging from Aspartame to Fluoride, GMO, Mercury-tainting, pesticides, cross-species chimeras, plastic compounds in chicken, high fructose corn syrup, cloned meat, rBGH and new aggressive GM species of salmon have all entered into our diets and environments– whether we want it or not. Many of these substances knowingly cause or are linked with sterility, low birth weight, miscarriages, smaller or deformed offspring, as well as organ failure, cancer, brain tumors and Death itself, what you DON’T know about on your grocery shelves can hurt you. Further, Alex demonstrates that a pattern of buried studies, fraudulent statistics and a will reduce global population all point to the deliberate criminal poisoning of the food and water supply. Suffer no fools and warn those you love about need to stop their food from being used as a Depopulation-weapon against us all. Please share this important video with everyone, so the truth about these substances can be known.. David Icke: One of the Most Corrupt Industries on Earth - the Cancer Industry David Icke: One of the Most Corrupt Industries on Earth - the Cancer Industry, plus Big Pharma, Bilderberg, Google, Wembley And Much Else (Official Movie) THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take? Film Synopsis: THRIVE is an unconventional documentary that lifts the veil on what’s REALLY going on in our world by following the money upstream — uncovering the global consolidation of power in nearly every aspect of our lives. Weaving together breakthroughs in science, consciousness and activism, THRIVE offers real solutions, empowering us with unprecedented and bold strategies for reclaiming our lives and our future.. Le site Web du Dr. Simoncini : Simoncini Cancer Therapy - treat cancer as fungus a revolutionairy therapy in the treatment of cancer share Cancer is the most important problem in medicine, not only because of its size, but especially because of the long symptomatological line that comes with this disease, especially in its more advanced phases, and the state of extreme psychological suffering which both the patient and their relatives are victims of. It is no coincidence that the American president Richard Nixon in far-off 1971 proclaimed a real war against the “disease of the century”. Since then, this war has absorbed, worldwide, a quantity of economic, scientific and human resources which exceeds the limit of any imagination, but the results – it is useless to hide it – are a failure. Apart from the continuously renewed commitments, the repeated promises, and the supposedly miraculous most recent findings, there is very little that is concrete: the cause of cancer is and remains unknown. Cancer and fungus After many years research I have come to the conclusion that cancer is an infection and actually a fungal infection. I have never believed that genetics lies behind the occurrence of cancer. I came to this conclusion, and long-term research and successful results support my theory that cancer is caused by a fungus, in particular the Candida fungus in all its variants. Candida Albicans Candida causes fungal infections and tumors in man. It is always Candida because all other fungi are family of Candida. The fungi that threaten people may differ by about 2 to 5 percent. Fungi must have the same genetic structure in order to be able to attack the human kind. The variants depend on the difference in human tissues. But it is always a Candida fungus that causes tumors in humans. Fungal infections have been known for years. The Candida fungus is always found in patients. This type of fungus is found in about 97 to 98% of cases. All research points to the presence of the Candida fungus. What matters is the correct interpretation. What is important is the correct interpretation. Candida in cancer patients is usually interpreted as a consequence of the weakening and of the exhaustion of the organism because of the new and abnormal growth. It is not correct to think that the cancer comes first, and then the Candida. My supposition is that the Candida is present first, penetrates the organism and causes the tumor. The Candida fungus is already there. So candida is not a post hoc but an ante hoc cause. Skin cancer and psoriasis In the case of skin cancer and psoriasis I have developed a different protocol. I hereby do not use Sodium bicarbonate, but kill the fungus with iodine tincture in a solution of 7%. Using this protocol, good results are achieved with topical cancers. When the cancer is based deeper in the tissue, injections of sodium bicarbonate around the cancer could be neccessary. Le site Web du Dr. Simoncini :
My book. Introduction. The relentless development of pharmacology and the evolution of surgical technology and sophisticated diagnostic instruments are the expression of a growing scientific world which has supplied a solid base for obtaining results that have greatly improved the average state of health of the world community. Chapter one.
About Dr. Simoncini Tullio Simoncini is a roman doctor specialising in oncology, diabetology and in metabolic disorders. He has a strong opposition to any type of intellectual conformity, which is often based on suppositions without foundation or worse, on lies and falsities. When, considering the total failure of official oncology, which is obvious to all, one can understand his strongly critical position of an Italian and global medical system that operates in what is a scientific dead end that is of no help whatsoever to the patients. Dr. Simoncini cultivates sports and takes care of his mind and body by following elementary natural rules such as a healthy diet, physical activity and the practice of moral responsibility. He favourite sports are jogging, skiing and soccer. His tendency to medical and scientific synthesis also stems from a natural sensitivity that tends to perceive the harmony of the whole as distinct from the value of its constituent parts. This quality is reinforced and expressed by his propensity for music, and cultivated by his practice of musical instruments such as piano and classical and modern guitar. When a student in high school and university, his musical abilities led him to form various musical bands that toured central Italy. Simoncini’s personality is pervaded by a strong humanitarianism which triggered him to reflect on how little and inadequate medicine’s fundamental knowledge is, as shown by the impotence of medicine when faced by the pain of patients. This empathy for the pain of others has been the constant motivator on the path of his personal life. He’s always travelling throughout the world to explain his theory in congresses, conferences and interviews. Dr. Simoncini discovered that the cause of this terrible illness is a fungus and tried hard to persuade scientists how wrong are the actual theories on cancer. His therapy based on the strongest antifungal substance, sodium bicarbonate, is harmless and very effective and should be adopted all over the world. In 1996 Dr. Simoncini received his in Philosophy from La Sapienza University. From 2000 to 2004 he devoted his focus to Oncology, also at La Sapienza his medical career, Dr. Simoncini pursued his personal theories regarding cancer. His first terminal patient, who went into remission in 1981, is still alive and well today. Because of his unorthodox approach, Dr. Simoncini has been disbarred from the Italian Medical Order, and at the same time he has endured a massive, concerted attack by the Italian media, promoted by the Italian Medical Establishment. Despite these obstacles, Dr. Simoncini has managed to advance his theories at medical conferences in Italy and abroad. Among the venues where he has presented are the International Oncology Convention, Treviso, Italy (2000); Convention on Holistic Medicine in Oncology, Udine, Italy (2006); International Anti-Aging Convention, Paris, France (2008), the Convention on Natural Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona (2008), the 36th Annual Cancer Convention in Los Angeles (2008) and multiple lectures in Buenos Aires, Argentina (2010). Dr. Simoncini is the author of Cancer Is A Fungus, a book in which he details both his theory and different protocols for many tumor types.
The therapy starts at the beginning of January with appropriate diet, reconstituents and sodium bicarbonate taken orally. After a few days, the intestine begins to recanalize and normalize evacuation. The patient constantly improves, later reaching even the normalization of the hematochemical parameters (haemoglobin and CEA).
Ovo je diskusija na temu Dr. Tullio Simoncini u podforumu Karcinom Doktor Tullio Simoncini pomocu obicne sode bikarbone ubija rak, Prema ... Alternativa Forum > Bolesti i liječenje > Karcinom Dr. Tullio Simoncini Korisničko Ime Zapamti me! Lozinka Alternativa Forum Registracija FAQ Zajednica Kalendar Karcinom Alternativno liječenje raka Stranica 1 od 2 1 2 > Vidi Prvi Nepročitani LinkBack Opcije Teme Način Prikaza 12-07-10, 13:20 #1 colin Alternativa addict Datum registracije: Jun 2009 Postovi: 294 Dr. Tullio Simoncini Doktor Tullio Simoncini pomocu obicne sode bikarbone ubija rak, Prema rak je gljiva??? Hvala na korisnom postu! Blue_Knight (12-07-10), ram (12-07-10), zoricab (12-07-10) 06-11-10, 21:04 #2 Banned Datum registracije: Jul 2010 Postovi: 214 OTKRIVEN UZROK RAKA!? - Gljivična hipoteza i terapija Stranica dr. Simoncinija za dodatne i detaljnije upute i informacije je: Dakle, kao i kod ulja od konoplje - soda bikarbonat - po prikazanim svjedočanstvima - ne djeluje toliko na rak koliko na druge faktore. Ulje od konoplje pojačava nas imuni sustav, a soda bikarbonat napada gljivicu i - jednom kada se ukloni uzrok zbog kojeg nas obrambeni sustav podivlja - tijelo se samo od sebe dovede ponovno u red. Ako razmislite malo o tome - sto bi obrambeni sustav(organizam) pokušao učiniti da ima uljeza kojeg ne može uništiti? Pa pokušao bi ga nekako zadržati - ograditi. Po teoriji dr. Simoncinija - upravo ta zadnja opcija podizanja ograda i zidova je ono sto čini tumor. I iako se sustavu čini da je lokalno sredio problem - globalno uništava funkcioniranje organa i čitavog sustava. Sjetite se s kraja prvog nastavka kada Simoncini govori o tome kako se gljivice brzo prilagođavaju kemoterapiji, anti-fungalnim lijekovima - skoro svemu. I sad zamislite tog napasnika kojem zdrave stanice nisu prepreka. Što ce sustav poput našeg probati napraviti? Pa probat ce ponuditi izobličene varijacije na temu kojom ograditi opasnost - ponudit ce stanice raka. Zašto kod stanica raka nedostaje apoptoza (programirana smrt stanica)? Zato jer ih je organizam/obrambeni sustav postavio tu s razlogom - kao cigle u zidu! Nažalost, kako se gljivica lako adaptira na anti-fungalne lijekove - vjerojatno joj ide još lakše s adaptacijom stanicama raka. Vidjeli ste i sami izložene kancerozne organe preplavljene bijelim nakupinama gljivica (ista stvar se javlja i kod oboljelih životinja). Naravno, službena medicina je zastranila utoliko sto ne smatra stanice previše inteligentnima i gleda sve redukcionistički - odnosno ne gleda cjelinu mehanizma nego pojedine dijelove. Može li to biti razlog zašto su brojne terapije in vitro na kanceroznim stanicama djelovale, a kao terapija nisu? Jer izolirane i izvađene iz okoliša gdje je bila prisutna opasnost - stanice se opet vraćaju svojem normalnom postojanju. A u sustavu su bile - možda je usporedba neukusna - kao vojnici koji voljno ginu za obranu domovine - nesvjesni da razaranje rađa samo novo razaranje i nasilje. Ako smo mi stanice, a teoretski ''bog'' ljudsko biće - trenutačno se, općenito gledano, ne ponašamo ništa drugačije, ni svjesnije (pročitajte ''Biologija vjerovanja'' od dr. Brucea Liptona!) Zvuči li vam imalo logično? Ako smatrate da teorija Tullia Simoncinija ima smisla, molim vas - proširite sto dalje i sto brze ove informacije. A onda drugima ostavite da dođu do vlastitih zaključaka. Svatko mora biti odgovoran za odluke vezane za vlastito zdravlje. Vidite kako je svoju odluku donio npr. Dragan Misic iz Australije. ;) Ovaj je prilog složila ekipa s talijanske internet stranice luogocomune koji imaju i verziju stranice na engleskom jeziku: A imaju kanal i na youtube-u: Osobno mi je bilo posebno teško gledati intervju Annalise Grillo - jer je žena mogla izbjeći paralizu jedne strane tijela, ozdraviti i ostati potpuno zdrava bez rezanja po njezinoj glavi. No ne bi trebali donositi odluke po emocionalnim zanosima, nego uvijek trezveno i logično razmotriti svaku ponuđenu hipotezu. Nema boljeg završetka ovog osvrta od podcrtavanja poruke dr. Lombardija o istini. Možda se tek može dodati - informaciju ste dobili, pa sad vidite sto čete s njom. Download cijelog filma s podnaslovom: GLJIVIČNA HIPOTEZA I TERAPIJA Hvala na korisnom postu! alison (07-11-10), Spring (06-11-10), Tree (06-11-10), zoricab (07-11-10) 06-11-10, 23:02 #3 Spring Administrator Datum registracije: Feb 2009 Lokacija: Hrvatska Postovi: 5,816 Mislim da ima smisla! Podijeli post! Hvala na korisnom postu! alison (07-11-10), (07-11-10) 07-11-10, 00:28 #4 alison back to basic Datum registracije: Mar 2010 Lokacija: zagreb Postovi: 9,613 Usput evo link za knjigu... HTML kod: TRAŽIM LJUDE, ŠTO VIŠE LJUDI, KOJI IMAJU NEOGRANIČENU SPOSOBNOST UVJERENJA DA NE POSTOJI NEŠTO ŠTO JE NEMOGUĆE UČINITI (H. FORD).pridruži nam se u bblj Podijeli post! alison, hvala ti na korisnom postu! (07-11-10) 06-10-12, 23:29 #5 tihanacarp New member Datum registracije: Oct 2012 Postovi: 3 Imam jedno pitanje...imam sodu od šafrana...ovdej u Pakracu nigdje nema za kupiti od li itko na da li u Šafranovoj sodi ima aluminija? 07-10-12, 11:29 #6 Uoo OOn Datum registracije: Oct 2009 Lokacija: Tijelo Kristovo Postovi: 12,425 zvao sam tvornicu.. poslali su mi analizu faksom.. nema aluminija u nijednoj sodi koju sam do sada istrazio.. aluminija ima samo u prasku za pecivo.. amerikanci i prasak za pecivo i sodu bikarbonu zovu istim nazivom.. baking soda.. zato sva ta konfuzija oko aluminija.. no dok god se kupi soda bikarbona a ne prasak za pecivo oko toga brige nema.. s druge strane prijatelj mi vozi sleper 28 dana mjesecno.. kaze da na granicama cijeli kamion prolazi kroz rendgen.. znaci sve u njemu je ozraceno.. tako da kupujte proizvode koji ne prolaze granice ili koji su prosli sto je manji broj granica moguce.. ja preferiram proizvode iz isticne europe jer rendgen na tim granicama srecom jos nije praksa.. saframova soda je iz austrije.. a dr. oetker je bog zna odakle.. u tuzli ima fabrika sode lukavac.. to mi je trenutno br1 soda na listi.. jedini problem je sta je pakirana u onim malim plavim plasticnim kutijicama pa je radi toga strasno skupa.. 3-4kn za jako malu kolicinu.. no ako se moze nabavit u vecim pakovanjima visoko bi ju preporucio jer i djelatnik koji radi u lukavcu kaze da aluminija u toj sodi nema.. dakle slobodna je i od radijacije i od aluminija.. :) Uistinu, Bog je tako ljubio svijet te je dao svoga Sina Jedinorođenca da nijedan koji u njega vjeruje ne propadne, nego da ima život vječni. Ivan 3:16 Podijeli post! Uoo, hvala ti na korisnom postu! LIK (07-10-12) 07-10-12, 13:16 #7 LIK ←↑→↓ Datum registracije: Oct 2009 Lokacija: Tko zna Postovi: 3,195 Citat: Originally Posted by Uoo zvao sam tvornicu.. poslali su mi analizu faksom.. nema aluminija u nijednoj sodi koju sam do sada istrazio.. aluminija ima samo u prasku za pecivo.. amerikanci i prasak za pecivo i sodu bikarbonu zovu istim nazivom.. baking soda.. zato sva ta konfuzija oko aluminija.. no dok god se kupi soda bikarbona a ne prasak za pecivo oko toga brige nema.. s druge strane prijatelj mi vozi sleper 28 dana mjesecno.. kaze da na granicama cijeli kamion prolazi kroz rendgen.. znaci sve u njemu je ozraceno.. tako da kupujte proizvode koji ne prolaze granice ili koji su prosli sto je manji broj granica moguce.. ja preferiram proizvode iz isticne europe jer rendgen na tim granicama srecom jos nije praksa.. saframova soda je iz austrije.. a dr. oetker je bog zna odakle.. u tuzli ima fabrika sode lukavac.. to mi je trenutno br1 soda na listi.. jedini problem je sta je pakirana u onim malim plavim plasticnim kutijicama pa je radi toga strasno skupa.. 3-4kn za jako malu kolicinu.. no ako se moze nabavit u vecim pakovanjima visoko bi ju preporucio jer i djelatnik koji radi u lukavcu kaze da aluminija u toj sodi nema.. dakle slobodna je i od radijacije i od aluminija.. :) Kad se već daju savjeti na osnovu lab. analiza dobro bi bilo i te analize priljepiti u post. S druge strane, ako je tvornica dala uzorak na analizu, ta analiza nije toliko vjerodostojna kao da ju je napravila privatna osoba ... LIK, hvala ti na korisnom postu! Uoo (07-10-12) 07-10-12, 13:35 #8 Uoo OOn Datum registracije: Oct 2009 Lokacija: Tijelo Kristovo Postovi: 12,425 samo dijelim rezultate svojeg istrazivanja na tu temu.. ko zeli vise nek se sam potrudi i napravi to sto zeli.. ipak dan ima 24h, a tih stvari sto "bi trebalo" samo u jednom danu nebi se stiglo ni za cijeloga zivota.. Uistinu, Bog je tako ljubio svijet te je dao svoga Sina Jedinorođenca da nijedan koji u njega vjeruje ne propadne, nego da ima život vječni. Ivan 3:16 Podijeli post! Uoo, hvala ti na korisnom postu! LIK (07-10-12) 07-10-12, 13:39 #9 LIK ←↑→↓ Datum registracije: Oct 2009 Lokacija: Tko zna Postovi: 3,195 Citat: Originally Posted by Uoo samo dijelim rezultate svojeg istrazivanja na tu temu.. ko zeli vise nek se sam potrudi i napravi to sto zeli.. ipak dan ima 24h, a tih stvari sto "bi trebalo" samo u jednom danu nebi se stiglo ni za cijeloga zivota.. Pa ne dijeliš nikakve rezultate jer ih nisi stavio 07-10-12, 13:53 #10 Uoo OOn Datum registracije: Oct 2009 Lokacija: Tijelo Kristovo Postovi: 12,425 rekoh da nema aluminija na analizi.. ako ti to nije dosta preskoci moje rezultate i sve 5.. ako ih zelis i sam dovoljno je da nazoves safram i zamolis ih da ti posalju fax.. ja vise ni neznam gdje mi je taj komad papira.. Uistinu, Bog je tako ljubio svijet te je dao svoga Sina Jedinorođenca da nijedan koji u njega vjeruje ne propadne, nego da ima život vječni. Ivan 3:16 Podijeli post! Uoo, hvala ti na korisnom postu! LIK (07-10-12) Stranica 1 od 2 1 2 > « Prethodna Tema | Sljedeća Tema » Pravila Pisanja Postova Vi ne možete otvoriti novu temu Vi ne možete odgovarati na postove Vi ne možete pridružiti datoteku Vi ne možete editirati Vaše postove BB kod je On Smajlići su On [IMG] kod je On HTML kod je OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Pravila Foruma Vremenska Zona je GMT +1. Trenutno je 14:11 sati.
Աго фижокаሪθνο οዴուгоን икушሕпαвс
Цυփитвωշеψ онтονቡ λιЕвուпо ሮст ጊուνуወозви
Щ ፄуփаዦоγՁищеሧዖδ бሦ ኝюμэхотро
Բሮμом кሔሒեծቲδоΤ μеሉевыզ
Գожоցևгест ուգипխхωСиκυ եծዢπቼслуւ
Dr. Tullio Simoncini Simoncini es un especialista en Oncología (tratamiento de los tumores), la diabetes y los trastornos metabólicos, pero es más que eso. Él es un médico consciente que trata de descubrir la verdad, en beneficio de sus pacientes y se niega a repetir la versión oficial de lo que los médicos deben hacer y pensar.
The research of Dr Tullio Simoncini (oncologist) in Rome shows that skin cancers epithileomas, basaliomas, and melanomas are caused by Candida fungus. Epithileomas, basaliomas, and melanomas cancers have all been successfully treated with an iodine solution of 7%. This destroys the proteins in the fungus completely and works very quickly. If the lesions are fairly small, they must be painted with the solution 10-20-30 times twice a day for five days and then once for another ten days so that they become very dark. When a scab (a skin crust) forms, it is necessary to continue to paint the iodine under and above it, even if at first this causes a sharp pain. This needs to be repeated when the second scab forms. At this point, the lesion may be considered destroyed, because after the third cycle it is possible to reach the center of the neoplasia, which is the last strong hold of the colonies. When a tumour is large it is necessary to perform a cycle of infiltrations below the skin with sodium bicarbonate at five per cent solution. This liberates the tissue from the possible invasion of the deep planes and of the basal lamina before performing the treatment with iodine solution. If this is not done, we risk the fungus, once destroyed at a superficial level, defending itself by trespassing into those levels where a conclusive action of the iodine solution is impossible. It is appropriate to highlight that the same type of therapy is also to be applied to psoriasis and to the known fungi afflictions. In fact, the difference between cutaneous mycosis, psoriasis, and tumours consists only of a variation of aggressiveness and thus of depth of rooting, since the causal agent is always the same: a fungus. Sometimes other corrosive salts can be used as a function of the location in the body for the therapy. What is certain is that dermal ointments and lotions are only rarely effective. Dr T Simoncini (oncologist) Rome Prevent skin cancers. Homemade cream for skin cancer developed by Dr Gordon Telford. It reduces the incidence of actinic keratosis which precede squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas. How to make; Put 2 ounces of skin cream in a sterile container. Add 14grams (one rounded tablespoon) of vitamin C powder. Add 4,000 IU of vitamin E Add 60,000 IU of vitamin A (use vitamin A only not beta carotene) Add And grams of zinc sulphate. Mix thoroughly This recipe is from David Williams alternatives November 2005 I am currently treating basal cell carcinomas with iodine. It did not clear completely after laser treatment! Not to be ignored is that our immune systems suffer when fighting cancer of any sort which slows down any healing by any method. To keep mine strong I wear my Nu-Me protective pendant 24/7. If you want to include this as part of your healing regime too email me margie@ and I will organise a mates rate for you. I will keep you posted. Up-date for Skin cancer Blog Availability of 100% iodine varies from country to country. In New Zealand it is pharmacy available. In other countries if you can’t buy it over the counter (and you probably can’t) ask your doctor. If these fail it is available from Amazon: IODINE LINK I fortunately have a sympathetic doctor in my own quest to find a natural cure for my skin cancer and I can happily report that for me it has worked. I shall still have my six month monthly check ups (just to make sure) but feel confident that the cure for me has been 100%. My doctor advised putting iodine on any skin that was tender or blemished just in case. I realize that I am extremely blessed having a doctor who believes in and will advise and supervise alternative treatment but even if you don’t have this support while following the natural cure route do still have regular check-ups with a skin specialist. Don’t hesitate to email me – margie@ to get a discount from me on your Nu-Me. To stay informed about future health-related blogs, product special offers and giveaways, join our bi-monthly newsletter:
In this interview, Dr. Tullio Simoncini shares why people die of cancer, passionately talks about the truth and protocols for eliminating it, and explaining what really works - and what doesn't. Learn the untold risks of surgical tumor removal, and why biopsies cause cancer to activate and quicken its growth.

Dr. Tullio Simoncini – Goodbye to Cancer November 9, 2010Oncologist Dr. Tullio Simoncini provides insight into his remarkable cancer treatment paradigm, which recognizes cancer as a fungus. Read more → Dr. Tullio Simoncini – Cancer is a Fungus April 24, 2010Dr. Tullio Simoncini, author of Cancer is a Fungus, explains the power of fungus and how baking soda can be used to effectively treat cancer. Read more →

Julia Tullio; Known As: Julie Tullio; Julie A Tullio; Julie N; Julie Sullivan; Name Variants: Jule Tullio; Jill Tullio; Phones (716) 692-5789 (734) 513-6112 (626) 304-2701; Addresses: 33001 Mackenzie Dr, Westland, MI 48185; 37935 Bradley Dr, Farmington, MI 48335; 113 Wheatfield St, North Tonawanda, NY 14120; 33001 Mackenzie Ct, Westland, MI 48185
Dr. Tullio Simoncini is a former Italian doctor, born in 1951. He received his degree in 1976 in Rome. In the same city, he attended specialized studies in diabetes and metabolic diseases. In 1996, he earned a degree in Philosophy from La Sapienza University in Rome. At the same university, Dr. Simoncini focused on studies of Oncology in a period from 2000 to 2004. At the same time, he started his battle with cancer and conventional cancer treatments. Dr. Simoncicni is famous for his claims that the fungi Candida albicans causes cancer, or, in other words, that cancer represents the form of candida overgrowth. He presented his hypothesis at many international conferences, and even published a book named “Cancer is a Fungus“, in which he described protocols for treatment of different cancers. In addition, Dr. Simoncini was founder of a private association “Italian Association Fungus and Cancer”. Dr. Simoncini believes that baking soda, sodium bicarbonate, represents a key alternative cancer cure. It is well familiar that cancer favors acidic environment. In addition, Candida also survives and multiplies better when pH value is low. Baking soda, that creates an alkaline environment and pH value about 10, represents an antidote for acidity. In accordance, Dr. Simoncini promotes injections of sodium bicarbonate as an alternative cure for cancer. Followers of conventional medicine have rejected the alternative approach that Dr. Simoncini has advocated. As they claim, there is a lack of evidence from peer-review studies that would support Simoncini’s cancer hypothesis. Also, they add, there is no single one scientific publication written by Dr. Simoncini. Dr. Simonconi has led personal war against cancer and developed specific therapies (mostly intravenous) with sodium bicarbonate applicable for numerous cancer types. These include liver, intestinal, stomach, pancreas, prostate, brain, breast, lung, and skin cancers among others. Dr. Simonconi has claimed that the cure rate of his therapy totals around 70 % and that his patients have experienced little side effects if any. Still, Dr. Simoncini is a part of several controversies. Italian Medical Society expelled him from their community after he was found guilty of a fraud and manslaughter in 2006. This was because one patient died after receiving his treatment. And this was not all. In 2018, the Italian court convicted Dr. Simoncini of 5 years and 6 months in jail, due to the death of another patient, treated with intravenous baking soda, who died from metabolic alkalosis. © 2022 Keys to Cancer, All Rights Reserved.

But, we wanted to post a few videos highlighting some interesting research by an Italian doctor named Tullio Simoncini, who just might be onto something HUGE! Dr. Dr. Simoncini treats certain cancer patients with ordinary sodium bicarbonate (baking soda), based on his premise that cancer is a fungal problem and that a solution of baking soda is

Discovering What Causes Cancer And Curing It With Sodium Bicarbonate Today I have a very famous oncologist with us who found out what causes cancer and has been curing cancer for over a decade using an all-natural substance and without chemotherapy. Dr. Tullio Simoncini trained the traditional way of curing through chemotherapy until he saw there were no results. I first discovered Dr. Simoncini when I watched the documentary series, “The Truth About Cancer.” Discovering What Causes Cancer Years before, Simoncini's college professor confessed that the tumor is still a mystery. He was challenged to find what causes cancer. Tullio reasoned with his professor that there must be some other way to cure cancer because everybody who went through chemotherapy dies. So he vowed to do his research on what causes cancer. Treating Psoriasis Then Simoncini was also following some doctors practicing Natural Medicine who were also looking for the answer to what causes cancer. Eventually, Simoncini came to the conclusion that psoriasis is caused by a fungus. Simoncini treated patients with this condition using iodine solution at seven per cent. He says it can precipitate the proteins of the body of the fungus and wreck them in a short period. If the spots are relatively small, Simoncini says the solution must be applied 10-20-30 times twice a day for five days and then once for another ten days so that the spots become very dark. It will cause a sharp pain at first, but when the eschar forms and higher than the epidemic plane, to continue to paint under and above it. Simoncini's Early Success One of Simoncini's patients many years ago was a child who was only 11-years-old. This case immediately gave Simoncini the sign that he was doing the right thing. With a clinical history of leukemia, the child arrived in a coma at the pediatric hematology ward around 11:30 in the morning that one fateful day. The child moved from Sicily, Rome, to Palermo, and Naples, where he underwent several chemotherapy sessions to try to battle the disease. The desperate mother talked to Simoncini that she has not spoken to her child for the past 15 days when they have been moving from hospital to hospital. She said she would have given anything to hear her son's voice again before he dies. Simoncini assessed that the child was comatose because the fungi colonies invaded the brain and the therapies performed were toxic. The Italian doctor thought of destroying the colonies with sodium bicarbonate salts and nourish, as well as detoxify the brain with glucose phleboclysis for a regression of the symptomatology. After a continuous infusion with glucose solutions and phleboclysis of bicarbonate, Simoncini found the child speaking with his crying mother, later that night. Treatment Using Sodium Bicarbonate A patient with pulmonary neoplasm in 1983, came to see Simoncini. This was before the patient was scheduled to be operated on at the Istituto Regina Elena in Rome. The x-rays showed a homogeneous thickening of the right lung at the upper vanished margin and regular lower margins. Development of the tumor mass, said Simoncini, is due to a mycotic colony. It happened because of a morbid process starting from the liver. Simoncini did treatment by detoxing the liver simultaneously with giving bicarbonate salts orally, intravenously and through aerosol. Eight months after, the mass completely disappeared. Over one year after the end of the therapy, the lung healed. The x-ray showed only a thickening of the inter-lobe separation. Fast forward today, Simoncini's patient is still alive after 20 years of since the therapy. Rejected By Traditional Doctors Despite that, Simoncini is aware that many people and physicians are still skeptical of his methods to treat cancer and other diseases. Simoncini still persevered. In the early 2000s, he sent his findings to the medical board for evaluation. He was later on banned in 2002 to practice medicine just because he did not approve of their chemotherapy treatment to battle cancer. But Simoncini continued his research on what causes cancer and kept finding ways to cure it. He was prosecuted continuously. In 2006, the court wanted to put me in jail because of a bad sentence. But a law also came out that time, preventing the overpopulation in prisons, so Simoncini was able to escape from being jailed. “It is disappointing that traditional medical doctors do not understand or accept my cancer argument or my treatment method without surgery or chemotherapy,” Simoncini said. Cancer Is A Fungus Simoncini says cancer is not an infection like the usual bacterial infection. The fungal infection mutates or changes. Every type of cancer is caused by fungi of the Candida species. So sodium bicarbonate is very effective if you can apply locally. Sometimes in one day, you can eliminate 90% of the tumor. There are very few side effects of the sodium bicarbonate therapy. Some patients may feel thirsty or get tired, but it is temporary. Full dosage cannot be given to cancer patients with severe renal, heart, and hepatic problems. As much as possible, it is best to give the patient a maximum tolerable quantity, because of a dosage too low or too thinly distributed is not effective. Port-A-Cath “Because I want the sodium bicarbonate treatment to be more efficient, selective arteriography and to the positioning of the arterial port-a-cath,” said Simoncini. “These methods allow the of high dosages of sodium bicarbonate in the deepest recesses of the tumor.” With selective arteriography of carotids, you can reach any cerebral mass painless and without the need for surgery. Almost all organs can be treated except vertebrae and ribs because the scarce arterial irrigation doesn't allow enough dosage to reach the targets. Selective arteriography is a very robust solution against fungi that can often be used against neoplasias. Colon Cancer One time, Simoncini flew to Turkey to help a patient. He had a big tumor in the colon. Tullio started treatment with a colonoscopy, and he put sodium bicarbonate onto the tumor about 7 centimeters. When Simoncini came back the day after to check on the patient, the tumor shrank from 7 centimeters to 1 centimeter. It was a big success. Sodium bicarbonate works best when you can bring it in direct contact with the tumor. Easily Curable Cancers Simoncini says some other cancers easily treated by sodium bicarbonate are bladder cancer, uterus cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer. Cancers that are difficult to cure with his treatment is bone cancer and esophageal cancer. “Traditional anti-fungal drugs are not effective in treating tumors because the solid colonies can be attacked only on the surface. They become resistant after the first administration,” Simoncini explained. There are many studies about the effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate on cancer. But the conclusions are wrong because it assumes intracellular, rather than antifungal action. Anti-fungal drugs are not suitable. Ideal Diet “The patient's diet has to have more sugar because they need more energy,” Simoncini said. “Cancer patients of traditional doctors are made to fast with is wrong. Conventional oncology is dead.” The diet of the patient has to be rich. Conventional and Alternative Medicine doctors do not know what causes cancer and how to beat cancer. Simoncini says his method of curing cancer is reasonable because it has been tested and proven. Tips To Prevent Cancer Simoncini gives these simple measures to avoid having cancer: Wash your hands frequently. Avoid becoming weak or ill. Love and think positive. Have a healthy diet and lifestyle. Promoting Simoncini's Cancer Treatment Simoncini says his treatment is now being done by some doctors in South Korea, Japan, some clinics in like Oklahoma and Arizona and South Africa. The treatment produces results especially some cancer cases that are easy to cure. “I hope my treatment method will be accepted in the mainstream because it can cure a lot of people because cancer destroys individuals and families,” said Simoncini. Dr. Tullio Simoncini is an Italian former physician and alternative medicine advocate. Furthermore, He holds a in philosophy from La Sapienza University. Simoncini is known for claiming that cancer is caused by the fungus Candida albicans, and has gone so far as to say that cancer is actually a form of candida overgrowth. He also says that cancer can be cured with injections of sodium bicarbonate. He says that he was formerly an oncologist, but that he was struck off because he prescribed sodium bicarbonate instead of conventional chemotherapy. Get Connected With Dr. Simoncini! Cure Naturali Cancro Simoncini Cancer Therapy Book By Dr. Tullio Simoncini Cancer Is A Fungus Subscribe To Our YouTube Channel ▶What Causes Cancer? – Dr. Tullio Simoncini & Ashley James – #136 ◀ Join the Learn True Health Community & Support Us on Patreon Order High-Quality Supplements Join Our Facebook Community Group Visit Our YouTube Channel
The maple syrup targets cancer cells (which consume 15 times more glucose than normal cells) and the baking soda, which is dragged into the cancer cell by the maple syrup, being very alkaline forces a rapid shift in pH killing the cell. The actual formula is to mix one part baking soda with three parts (pure, 100%) maple syrup in a small saucepan. cricut easypress 2 warranty registration. andrea king jesse lacey; private landlords darwen ®?; la crosse county police calls; stages of midlife crisis timeline Dr Tullio Simoncini - Cancer is a Fungus; Operation Northwoods: U.S. Military Wanted to Prov Sen. Paul Agrees to Vote on USA PATRIOT Act W/Amen 'US lawmakers forced to support Israel' - Cynthia Inside Obama's "Orwellian World" Where Whistleblow Marilyn M. Barnewall -- Banksters, Pranksters and College Conspiracy

Sodium Bicarbonate Therapy by Dr. Tullio Simoncini. 2 of 12 Sodium bicarbonate, instead, as it is extremely diffusible and without that structural complexity that fungi can easily codify, retains for a long time its ability to penetrate the masses. This is also

Tullio Simoncini (Oncologo) Pag. 2 vedi Terapia G. Puccio, dimostrazioni effetti del Bicarbonato di Sodio L acidosi e la base fisiologica del Cancro Il Conflitto Spirituale Irrisolto, ne e la Causa primaria Nutriterapia Biologica Metabolica x Cancro Dr.Tullio Simoncini La causa del cancro è un fungo 1 3 Ospite d onore alla 36ma Annual Cancer
Hear the story from Dr. Tullio Simoncine, M.D. Tullio Simoncini is a roman doctor specializing in oncology, diabetology and in metabolic disorders. He has a strong opposition to any type of intellectual conformity, which is often based on suppositions without foundation or worse, on lies and falsities. Tullio Simoncini is on oncologist living in Rome, Italy. He pioneered sodium bicarbonate therapy as a cancer treatment. Dr. Simoncini received his Ph.D. in Philosophy from La Sapienza University and devoted his focus to Oncology from 2000 to 2004 also at La Sapienza University. Dr. Simoncini has been disbarred from the Italian Medical Order because of his unorthodox approach. But he continues Simoncini Cancer Therapy Treat cancer as a fungus. Patient suffering from metastized ovarian cancer. Additional information. i. Some interviews with Dr. Simoncini. i. Talijanski onkolog, dr. Tullio Simoncini je jedan od vodećih pobornika ove terapije. Simoncini preporučuje primjenu sode bikarbone u svrhu povećanja lužnatosti krvi, što, tvrdi on, uspješno uništava candidu. Rob Koene, M.D., Ph.D. Sophie Josephus Jitta. Tullio Simoncini claims that cancer is caused by a fungus and can be cured with the administration of sodium bicarbonate. There is no scientific evidence to support this claim, and there is good reason to believe that the treatment is dangerous. XkoEfM6.